Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517097›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Influence of Custom-Milled Framework Design for an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D-FEA Sudy.

João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Roberto Lo Giudice, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Marco Antonio Bottino, Ettore Epifania, Pietro Ausiello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Impact of Margin Type and Material Choice on Stress Distribution in Endocrown Restorations: A 3D Finite Element Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

João Paulo Mendes TribstDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics at São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil.
Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal PivaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics at São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil.
Roberto Lo GiudiceDeptartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Messina University, 98100 Messina, Italy.
Alexandre Luiz Souto BorgesDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics at São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil.
Marco Antonio BottinoDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics at São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil.
Ettore EpifaniaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, S, via Sergio Pansini n. 5- 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Pietro AusielloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, S, via Sergio Pansini n. 5- 80131 Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate the mechanical behavior of two different maxillary prosthetic rehabilitations according to the framework design using the Finite Element Analysis. An implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis was developed using a modeling software. Two conditions were modeled: a conventional casted framework and an experimental prosthesis with customized milled framework. The geometries of bone, prostheses, implants and abutments were modeled. The mechanical properties and friction coefficient for each isotropic and homogeneous material were simulated. A load of 100 N load was applied on the external surface of the prosthesis at 30° and the results were analyzed in terms of von Mises stress, microstrains and displacements. In the experimental design, a decrease of prosthesis displacement, bone strain and stresses in the metallic structures was observed, except for the abutment screw that showed a stress increase of 19.01%. The conventional design exhibited the highest stress values located on the prosthesis framework (29.65 MPa) between the anterior implants, in comparison with the experimental design (13.27 MPa in the same region). An alternative design of a stronger framework with lower stress concentration was reported. The current study represents an important step in the design and analysis of implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis with limited occlusal vertical dimension.

Indexed as

Dental ProsthesisBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisStress, Mechanicalbiomechanics.computer assisted numerical analysesfinite elements analysisfixed full-arch prosthesisimplants prosthetic dentistrymechanical stress

Identifiers

PMID32517097
PMCPMC7313457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.