Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516949›Full record

ReviewViruses2020

Next-Generation Sequencing for HIV Drug Resistance Testing: Laboratory, Clinical, and Implementation Considerations.

Santiago Ávila-Ríos, Neil Parkin, Ronald Swanstrom, Roger Paredes, Robert Shafer, Hezhao Ji, Rami Kantor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Santiago Ávila-RíosCentre for Research in Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Calzada de Tlalpan 4502, Col. Sección XVI, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Neil ParkinData First Consulting, Inc., Sebastopol, CA 95472, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5824-3388
Ronald SwanstromLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Roger ParedesIrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, 08916 Catalonia, Spain.
Robert ShaferDivision of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Hezhao JiNational HIV and Retrovirology Laboratories at JC Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-6294
Rami KantorDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brown University Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI 02906, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-1108

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Addressing HIV drug resistance research gaps in a cohort of perinatally infected Kenyan children and adolescentsR01AI147333 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI KANTOR, RAMI, VREEMAN, RACHEL CHRISTINE · 2019 to 2024
$3.9M
HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Different SubtypesR01AI066922 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KANTOR, RAMI, KATZENSTEIN, DAVID ALLENBERG · 2008 to 2012
$3.6M
HIV Treatment Failure and Drug Resistance in Western Kenyan ChildrenR01AI120792 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KANTOR, RAMI, VREEMAN, RACHEL CHRISTINE · 2016 to 2019
$2.9M
HIV Drug Resistance, Monitoring and TransmissionK24AI134359 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI Rami Kantor · 2018 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI134359NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066922NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher accessibility and decreasing costs of next generation sequencing (NGS), availability of commercial kits, and development of dedicated analysis pipelines, have allowed an increasing number of laboratories to adopt this technology for HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) genotyping. Conventional HIVDR genotyping is traditionally carried out using population-based Sanger sequencing, which has a limited capacity for reliable detection of variants present at intra-host frequencies below a threshold of approximately 20%. NGS has the potential to improve sensitivity and quantitatively identify low-abundance variants, improving efficiency and lowering costs. However, some challenges exist for the standardization and quality assurance of NGS-based HIVDR genotyping. In this paper, we highlight considerations of these challenges as related to laboratory, clinical, and implementation of NGS for HIV drug resistance testing. Several sources of variation and bias occur in each step of the general NGS workflow, i.e., starting material, sample type, PCR amplification, library preparation method, instrument and sequencing chemistry-inherent errors, and data analysis options and limitations. Additionally, adoption of NGS-based HIVDR genotyping, especially for clinical care, poses pressing challenges, especially for resource-poor settings, including infrastructure and equipment requirements and cost, logistic and supply chains, instrument service availability, personnel training, validated laboratory protocols, and standardized analysis outputs. The establishment of external quality assessment programs may help to address some of these challenges and is needed to proceed with NGS-based HIVDR genotyping adoption.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansAnti-HIV AgentsHIV drug resistanceimplementationlow-abundance variantslow/medium-income countriesnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32516949
PMCPMC7354449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.