Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516839›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2020

Early experience with convalescent plasma as immunotherapy for COVID-19 in China: Knowns and unknowns.

Binzhen Chen, Rong Xia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Demographic Characteristics and Lifestyle Habits of Chinese Plasma Donors: A Multicenter Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  15. COVID-19: breaking down a global health crisis.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Binzhen ChenDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3512-1526
Rong XiaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIn the absence of a vaccine or specific drug treatment options for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), attention has been shifted in China to the possible therapeutic use of convalescent plasma. COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is currently under investigation. We summarized clinical studies and other research data available as of 5 May 2020 on CCP therapy according to the Clinical Treatment Guideline of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in China, as well as clinical experience at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, as part of a comprehensive anti-epidemic strategy. MATERIALS AND

methodsAs of 5 May 2020, when the epidemic was well-controlled in China, healthcare databases and sources of English literature relating to convalescent plasma were searched and reviewed. Sources of clinical and methodological heterogeneity were identified.

resultsAs of 5 May 2020, up to 2000 samples of CCP had been collected across China and administered to 700 COVID-19 patients. From donors, 200-400 ml of plasma was collected at each donation, with antibody titres > 1:160. We identified three clinical studies for COVID-19 in China. Analyses showed a statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with untreated cases (P < 0.001). No adverse effects were reported.

conclusionFrom initial studies, convalescent plasma therapy appears effective and safe for COVID-19. However, there is clearly a need for well-designed RCTs (randomized controlled trials) or other formal studies to further evaluate the efficacy and any potential adverse effects of CCP.

Indexed as

ChinaClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassivePandemicsPneumonia, ViralTreatment OutcomeCOVID-19COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP)SARS-CoV-2therapy

Identifiers

PMID32516839
PMCPMC7300975
OpenAlexW3033638854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.