Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516764›Full record

ArticleDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders2020

Eye Tracking Analysis of Visual Cues during Wayfinding in Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease.

Rebecca Davis, Alla Sikorskii

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pediatricians' focus of sight at pain assessment during a neonatal heel puncture.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Mapping the Evolutions and Trends of Literature on Wayfinding in Indoor Environments.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca DavisKirkhof College of Nursing, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA, davirebe@gvsu.edu.
Alla SikorskiiDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Grand Valley State University · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Wayfinding in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Within a Virtual Senior ResidenceR15AG037946 · NIA · GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, REBECCA · 2012 to 2012
$316k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG037946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have profound impairment in wayfinding, potentially related to a deficit in visual attention and selection of relevant environmental information. This study sought to determine differences in visual attention to salient visual cues and nonsalient cues (building features) in older adults with and without AD during active wayfinding in a large-scale, virtual reality spatial task.

methodsFifteen subjects (7 with AD and 8 controls without AD) were asked to find their way repeatedly during 10 trials in a virtual simulation of a senior retirement community. Subjects wore eye tracking glasses to capture visual fixations while wayfinding. The least square means (LSMs) and their standard errors (SEs) for percentage of fixations and duration of fixations on salient and nonsalient cues were estimated from the linear mixed effects models and compared by group (AD or control) and cue type.

resultsThe group by cue type interaction was significant for both percentage of fixations (F(1, 13) = 6.79, p = 0.02) and duration of fixations (F(1, 13) = 4.87, p = 0.04). The AD group had significantly lower percentages of fixations on salient cues, LSM = 57.91 (SE = 2.44), compared to controls, LSM = 66.40 (SE = 2.19); p = 0.03. Persons with AD had a higher percentage of fixations on building features, LSM = 31.65 (SE = 2.18), than controls, LSM = 24.54 (SE = 1.95); p = 0.02. Shorter durations of fixations on salient cues were experienced by the AD group, LSM = 38.89 (SE = 1.69), than the control group, LSM = 44.69 (SE = 1.55); p = 0.02. DISCUSSION/

conclusionIndividuals with AD may have difficulty selecting relevant information for wayfinding as compared to normally aging individuals and attend more frequently than controls to irrelevant information. This may help explain the wayfinding difficulties seen in AD.

Indexed as

Eye Movement MeasurementsEye-Tracking TechnologySpatial NavigationSpatial ProcessingAgedAlzheimer DiseaseCuesEarly DiagnosisFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleVirtual RealityAlzheimer’s diseaseEye trackingWayfinding

Identifiers

PMID32516764
PMCPMC7483804
OpenAlexW3033559250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.