Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516554›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020

Staging of bladder cancer with multiparametric MRI.

Hiroshi Juri, Yoshifumi Narumi, Valeria Panebianco, Keigo Osuga

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Performance ofiScience · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Genitourinary System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroshi JuriDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshifumi NarumiDepartment of Health Care, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Japan.
Valeria PanebiancoDepartment of Radiological Sciences Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Keigo OsugaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPKyoto Tachibana University · JPPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distinction of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive bladder cancer is important for the selection of the optimal treatment. Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) has been an useful modality for the T staging of bladder cancer, and a systematic evaluation of mp-MRI is needed. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System was designed to standardize the scanning and reporting criteria based on mp-MRI for clinical and research applications. This review briefly describes the method, interpretation, and timing of mp-MRI examinations in the clinical settings. Validation studies of Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System and future perspectives are also considered.

Indexed as

HumansMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32516554
PMCPMC7446004
OpenAlexW3033618003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.