Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516486›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

A randomized clinical trial of an interactive voice response and text message intervention for individuals with hypertension.

Emily B Schroeder, Kelly R Moore, Spero M Manson, Megan A Baldwin, Glenn K Goodrich, Allen S Malone, Lisa E Pieper, Stanley Xu, Meredith P Fort, Linda Son-Stone and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emily B SchroederKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kelly R MooreCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Spero M MansonCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Megan A BaldwinKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Glenn K GoodrichKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Allen S MaloneKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Lisa E PieperKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Stanley XuKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Meredith P FortCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Linda Son-StoneFirst Nations Community HealthSource, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
David JohnsonFirst Nations Community HealthSource, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
John F SteinerKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USHealth First · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USNative Health · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH COREP30DK092923 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Angela Gwen Brega · 2011 to 2026
$10.2M
Blood Pressure and Progression of Diabetic Kidney DiseaseK23DK099237 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SCHROEDER, EMILY BARTLETT · 2014 to 2018
$869k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 15SFDRN25710168NIDDK NIH HHS 1K23DK099237NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092923NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactive voice response and text message (IVR-T) technology may improve hypertension control in under-resourced settings. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether an IVR-T intervention would improve blood pressure (BP), medication adherence and visit keeping among adults with hypertension from multiple racial and ethnic groups in primary care at an Urban Indian Health Organization in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Two hundred and ninety-five participants were randomly assigned to IVR-T (N = 148) or to usual care (N = 147). The IVR-T arm received reminders for clinic visits, messages to reschedule missed clinic visits, monthly medication refill reminders, weekly motivational messages, and a blood pressure cuff. The usual care arm received no messages. The primary outcome was change in systolic BP (SBP) between baseline and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in SBP between baseline and 6 months, change in diastolic BP (DBP) at 6 and 12 months, self-reported adherence at 6 months, and the proportion of missed primary care clinic appointments. The intervention did not affect SBP or DBP at 6 or 12 months. The 12-month change in SBP/DBP was 1.66/1.10 mm Hg in usual care and 0.23/1.34 mm Hg in the intervention group (P values = .57 and .88, respectively). Self-reported medication adherence improved comparably in both groups, and there was no difference in percentage of kept visits. Several features of study design, clinic operations, and data transfer were barriers to demonstrating effectiveness.

Indexed as

HypertensionText MessagingAdultBlood PressureHumansMedication AdherencePrimary Health CareAmerican Indiansdisparitieshypertensionmedication adherenceprimary care visitsrandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID32516486
PMCPMC8029814
OpenAlexW3033533444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.