Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516485›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2020

A new method of metabarcoding Microsporidia and their hosts reveals high levels of microsporidian infections in mosquitoes (Culicidae).

Artur Trzebny, Anna Slodkowicz-Kowalska, James J Becnel, Neil Sanscrainte, Miroslawa Dabert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A NovelPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Mosquitoes (Culicidae) as a vector ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluating Atlantic Salmon (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Co-Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Artur TrzebnyMolecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-7243
Anna Slodkowicz-KowalskaDepartment of Biology and Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine I, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-2031
James J BecnelUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-0005
Neil SanscrainteUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-5278
Miroslawa DabertMolecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5930-3346
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLAgricultural Research Service · USPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

National Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA metabarcoding offers new perspectives, especially with regard to the high-throughput identification and diagnostics of pathogens. Microsporidia are an example of widely distributed, opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms in which molecular identification is important for both environmental research and clinical diagnostics. We have developed a method for parallel detection of both microsporidian infection and the host species. We designed new primer sets: one specific for the classical Microsporidia (targeting the hypervariable V5 region of small subunit [ssu] rDNA), and a second one targeting a shortened fragment of the COI gene (standard metazoan DNA-barcode); both markers are well suited for next generation sequencing. Analysis of the ssu rDNA data set representing 607 microsporidian species (120 genera) indicated that the V5 region enables identification of >98% species in the data set (596/607). To test the method, we used microsporidians that infect mosquitoes in natural populations. Using mini-COI data, all field-collected mosquitoes were unambiguously assigned to seven species; among them almost 60% of specimens were positive for at least 11 different microsporidian species, including a new microsporidian ssu rDNA sequence (Microsporidium sp. PL01). Phylogenetic analysis showed that this species belongs to one of the two main clades in the Terresporidia. We found a high rate of microsporidian co-infections (9.4%). The numbers of sequence reads for the operational taxonomic units suggest that the occurrence of Nosema spp. in co-infections could benefit them; however, this observation should be retested using a more intensive host sampling. Our results show that DNA barcoding is a rapid and cost-effective method for deciphering sample diversity in greater resolution, including the hidden biodiversity that may be overlooked using classical methodology.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMicrosporidiaMicrosporidiosisAnimalsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, RibosomalPhylogenyDNA, Ribosomalco-infectionDNA barcodingmolecular diagnosticsmolecular phylogenyNosema spp.rDNA

Identifiers

PMID32516485
PMCPMC7818484
OpenAlexW3032976882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.