Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students.

Christine V Wood, Remi F Jones, Robin G Remich, Anne E Caliendo, Nicole C Langford, Jill L Keller, Patricia B Campbell, Richard McGee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christine V WoodDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Remi F JonesScientific Careers Research and Development Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Robin G RemichScientific Careers Research and Development Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Anne E CaliendoScientific Careers Research and Development Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Nicole C LangfordScientific Careers Research and Development Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Jill L KellerUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine (retired), Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Patricia B CampbellCampbell-Kibler Associates, Groton, MA, United States of America.
Richard McGeeFaculty Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-5689

Funding

The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Understanding Career Choices, Transitions and Success of Young Biomedical ScientistsR35GM118184 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2016 to 2025
$6.5M
Career Decision-Making of Future Minority Biomedical Science FacultyR01GM085385 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2008 to 2015
$3.0M
Pivotal Career Decisions Guiding Potential Women Science FacultyR01NR011987 · NINR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085385NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118184NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young biomedical PhD scientists are needed in a wide variety of careers. Many recent efforts have been focused on revising training approaches to help them choose and prepare for different careers. However, very little is known about how biomedical PhD students decide on and "differentiate" into careers, which limits the development of new training models. This knowledge gap also severely limits efforts to increase the representation of women and some racial/ethnic groups in academic research careers. Previous studies have used cross-sectional surveys of career interests and ratings, and have not been designed to identify career intentions. They also are limited by single-time data and response bias, having typically asked participants to recount decisions made years in the past. This report draws on annual, in-depth interviews with 147 biomedical PhD students from the start of the PhD to graduation. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to fully understand scientific development and career intentions over time. Longitudinal analysis reveals a striking level of fluidity and complexity in career intentions over time. Contrary to previous studies and the dominant narrative, data do not show generalized shifts away from academic careers. In addition to those who are consistent in this intention from the start, nearly as many students shift toward research academic careers as away from them, and only modest differences exist by gender and race/ethnicity. Thus, the dominant narrative misses the high fraction of individuals who acquire or sustain their intention to purse an academic research career during training. Efforts to increase diversity in academia must capitalize on and support those who are still considering and evolve toward an academic career. Efforts to revise research training should incorporate knowledge of the tremendous fluidity in when and how career differentiation occurs.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceAdultBiomedical ResearchEducation, GraduateFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32516342
PMCPMC7282657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.