Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32516325›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Paradoxical effects on voltage-gated Na+ conductance in adrenal chromaffin cells by twin vs single high intensity nanosecond electric pulses.

Lisha Yang, Sophia Pierce, Indira Chatterjee, Gale L Craviso, Normand Leblanc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NaThe Journal of membrane biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Modulating CaBiophysical journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 5 ns electric pulses induce CaBioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisha YangDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-4298
Sophia PierceDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.
Indira ChatterjeeDepartment of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States of America.
Gale L CravisoDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.
Normand LeblancDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1090-9432
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Role of ANO1 Channels and Its Regulation by PIP2 in EC-Coupling in Pulmonary Artery MyocytesR01HL146054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI EARLEY, SCOTT, LEBLANC, NORMAND · 2019 to 2022
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that a single 5 ns high intensity electric pulse (NEP) caused an E-field-dependent decrease in peak inward voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) in isolated bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. This study explored the effects of a pair of 5 ns pulses on INa recorded in the same cell type, and how varying the E-field amplitude and interval between the pulses altered its response. Regardless of the E-field strength (5 to 10 MV/m), twin NEPs having interpulse intervals ≥ than 5 s caused the inhibition of TTX-sensitive INa to approximately double relative to that produced by a single pulse. However, reducing the interval from 1 s to 10 ms between twin NEPs at E-fields of 5 and 8 MV/m but not 10 MV/m decreased the magnitude of the additive inhibitory effect by the second pulse in a pair on INa. The enhanced inhibitory effects of twin vs single NEPs on INa were not due to a shift in the voltage-dependence of steady-state activation and inactivation but were associated with a reduction in maximal Na+ conductance. Paradoxically, reducing the interval between twin NEPs at 5 or 8 MV/m but not 10 MV/m led to a progressive interval-dependent recovery of INa, which after 9 min exceeded the level of INa reached following the application of a single NEP. Disrupting lipid rafts by depleting membrane cholesterol with methyl-β-cyclodextrin enhanced the inhibitory effects of twin NEPs on INa and ablated the progressive recovery of this current at short twin pulse intervals, suggesting a complete dissociation of the inhibitory effects of twin NEPs on this current from their ability to stimulate its recovery. Our results suggest that in contrast to a single NEP, twin NEPs may influence membrane lipid rafts in a manner that enhances the trafficking of newly synthesized and/or recycling of endocytosed voltage-gated Na+ channels, thereby pointing to novel means to regulate ion channels in excitable cells.

Indexed as

ElectricityAdrenal GlandsAnimalsbeta-CyclodextrinsCattleCells, CulturedChromaffin CellsMembrane PotentialsPatch-Clamp TechniquesVoltage-Gated Sodium Channelsbeta-Cyclodextrinsmethyl-beta-cyclodextrinVoltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID32516325
PMCPMC7282663
OpenAlexW3033410266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.