Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32515885›Full record

Observational studyJournal of occupational health2020

Assessment of pressure pain threshold at the cervical and lumbar spine region in the group of professionally active nurses: A cross-sectional study.

Anna Kołcz, Karolina Jenaszek

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of occupational health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pain manifestations in nursing professionals: a scoping review.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna KołczLaboratory of Ergonomics and Biomedical Monitoring, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6646-3652
Karolina JenaszekLaboratory of Ergonomics and Biomedical Monitoring, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-6235
Wroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

Statutory Grant of the Wroclaw Medical University for maintaining research potential SUB.E060.19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe problem of spinal pain among nurses and lack of compliance with workplace ergonomy is increasing. The study aimed to assess the pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the cervical and lumbar spine in nursing staff.

methodsThe sample of this prospective and observational study consisted of 30 female nurses with a mean age of 38.6 ± 11.1 years. The standardized Oswestry (ODI) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used, as well as the Authors' Designed Questionnaire (ADQ) was used to assess compliance with ergonomic principles. The PPT analysis using a computerized pressure algometer (CPA) was performed to examine the level of PPT.

resultsA mild disability was found in 56% of nurses (NDI and ODI). A value of <4 kg/cm

conclusionsPain complaints are associated with lower PPT of trapezius and erector spinae muscles and asymmetry of muscle tension. Also, it was noted that the lack of implementation of ergonomic principles by nursing staff affects their degree of disability.

Indexed as

NursesPain ThresholdAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLow Back PainMiddle AgedNeck PainPressureProspective Studiescomputerized pressure algometrynursing practiceoswestry and neck disability indexpressure pain thresholdspinal pain syndromesworkplace ergonomy

Identifiers

PMID32515885
PMCPMC7001494
OpenAlexW3004497658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.