ArticleJournal of occupational health2020
Inter-laboratory comparison of pulmonary lesions induced by intratracheal instillation of NiO nanoparticle in rats: Histopathological examination results.
Article in Journal of occupational health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a new alternative method to inhalation exposure: intratracheal instillation studies using molecular dispersion.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2025Article
- The pulmonary effects of nickel-containing nanoparticles: Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and their underlying mechanisms.Environmental science. Nano · 2024Article
- Time-course comparison of pulmonary inflammation induced by intratracheal instillation of four different nickel oxide nanoparticles in male Fischer rats.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2021Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for the Ranking of Pulmonary Toxicity of Nanomaterials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Inter-laboratory comparison of pulmonary lesions induced by intratracheal instillation of NiO nanoparticle in rats: Histopathological examination results.Journal of occupational health · 2020Article
- Long-term observation of pulmonary toxicity of toner with external additives following a single intratracheal instillation in rats.Journal of occupational health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, in order to investigate the usefulness of intratracheal instillation in assessing the pulmonary toxicity of nanomaterials, intratracheal instillation of nickel oxide-nanoparticles (NiO-NP) was performed.
methodsIn this study, rats were administered test materials by intratracheal instillation at five different research institutions in order to assess the validity of using intratracheal instillation for hazard identification of nanomaterials. Eight-week-old male SD rats were administered NiO-NP dispersed in deionized water by a single intratracheal instillation at doses of 0 (vehicle control), 0.2, 0.67, and 2 mg/kg BW. Three days after instillation, histopathological examination of the lungs was performed.
resultsNiO-NP was distributed in the vicinity of hilus of the lung and in the alveoli around the bronchioles. Histopathological changes such as degeneration/necrosis of macrophages, inflammation, and proliferation of type II pneumocyte in the lung were observed, and their severity corresponded with increasing dose. The histopathological observations of pulmonary toxicity were almost similar at each institution.
conclusionThe similarity of the histopathological changes observed by five independent groups indicates that intratracheal instillation can be a useful screening method to detect the pulmonary toxicity of nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.