Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32515750›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2019

Copy Number Variation Detection Using Total Variation.

Fatima Zare, Sheida Nabavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatima ZareUniversity of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut 06269.
Sheida NabaviUniversity of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut 06269.

Funding

Novel integrative method to detect biomakers of breast cancer resistanceR00LM011595 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI NABAVI, SHEIDA · 2015 to 2017
$597k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM011595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies offer new opportunities for precise and accurate identification of genomic aberrations, including copy number variations (CNVs). For high-throughput NGS data, using depth of coverage has become a major approach to identify CNVs, especially for whole exome sequencing (WES) data. Due to the high level of noise and biases of read-count data and complexity of the WES data, existing CNV detection tools identify many false CNV segments. Besides, NGS generates a huge amount of data, requiring to use effective and efficient methods. In this work, we propose a novel segmentation algorithm based on the total variation approach to detect CNVs more precisely and efficiently using WES data. The proposed method also filters out outlier read-counts and identifies significant change points to reduce false positives. We used real and simulated data to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and compare its performance with those of other commonly used CNV detection methods. Using simulated and real data, we show that the proposed method outperforms the existing CNV detection methods in terms of accuracy and false discovery rate and has a faster runtime compared to the circular binary segmentation method.

Indexed as

Copy Number VariationNext Generation SequencingSignal ProcessingTaut StringTotal VariationWhole Exome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32515750
PMCPMC7278034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.