Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32515480›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Vaginal bacterial community composition and concentrations of estradiol at the time of artificial insemination in Brangus heifers.

Riley D Messman, Zully E Contreras-Correa, Henry A Paz, George Perry, Caleb O Lemley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Vaginal Microbiome Dynamics of Cows in Different Parities.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riley D MessmanDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
Zully E Contreras-CorreaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
Henry A PazDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
George PerryDepartment of Animal Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.
Caleb O LemleyDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
Mississippi State University · USSouth Dakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The knowledge surrounding the bovine vaginal microbiota and its implications on fertility and reproductive traits remains incomplete. The objective of the current study was to characterize the bovine vaginal bacterial community and estradiol concentrations at the time of artificial insemination (AI). Brangus heifers (n = 78) underwent a 7-d Co-Synch + controlled internal drug release estrus synchronization protocol. At AI, a double-guarded uterine culture swab was used to sample the anterior vaginal tract. Immediately after swabbing the vaginal tract, blood samples were collected by coccygeal venipuncture to determine concentrations of estradiol. Heifers were retrospectively classified as pregnant (n = 29) vs. nonpregnant (n = 49) between 41 and 57 d post-AI. Additionally, heifers were classified into low (1.1 to 2.5 pg/mL; n = 21), medium (2.6 to 6.7 pg/mL; n = 30), and high (7.2 to 17.6 pg/mL; n = 27) concentration of estradiol. The vaginal bacterial community composition was determined through sequencing of the V4 region from the 16S rRNA gene using the Illumina Miseq platform. Alpha diversity was compared via ANOVA and beta diversity was compared via PERMANOVA. There were no differences in the Shannon diversity index (alpha diversity; P = 0.336) or Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (beta diversity; P = 0.744) of pregnant vs. nonpregnant heifers. Overall, bacterial community composition in heifers with high, medium, or low concentrations of estradiol did not differ (P = 0.512). While no overall compositional differences were observed, species-level differences were present within pregnancy status and estradiol concentration groups. The implications of these species-level differences are unknown, but these differences could alter the vaginal environment thereby influencing fertility and vaginal health. Therefore, species-level changes could provide better insight rather than overall microbial composition in relation to an animal's reproductive health.

Indexed as

CattleAnimalsBacteriaEstradiolEstrogensEstrus SynchronizationFemaleFertilityGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneInsemination, ArtificialPregnancyPregnancy RateProgesteroneReproductionRetrospective StudiesRNA, BacterialEstradiolEstrogensGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneProgesteroneRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBrangusestradiolmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID32515480
PMCPMC7281872
OpenAlexW3030020835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.