Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32515254›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Catheterization Laboratory Survey.

Subhash Banerjee, Giuseppe Tarantini, Mazen Abu-Fadel, Avantika Banerjee, Bertis B Little, Paul Sorajja, Mehdi H Shishehbor, Emmanouil S Brilakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Safety and Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Coronavirus Disease 2019 Catheterization Laboratory Survey.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Subhash BanerjeeVeterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System Dallas TX.
Giuseppe TarantiniCardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Department University of Padua Italy.
Mazen Abu-FadelOklahoma Heart Hospital Oklahoma City OK.
Avantika BanerjeeGeorgetown University Hospital Washington DC.
Bertis B LittleUniversity of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences Louisville KY.
Paul SorajjaValve Science Center Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation Abbott Northwestern Hospital Minneapolis MN.
Mehdi H ShishehborHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland OH.
Emmanouil S BrilakisMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation Minneapolis MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is expected to affect operations and lifestyles of interventional cardiologists around the world in unprecedented ways. Timely gathering of information on this topic can provide valuable insight and improve the handling of the ongoing and future pandemic outbreaks. Methods and Results A survey instrument developed by the authors was disseminated via e-mail, text messaging, WhatsApp, and social media to interventional cardiologists between April 6, 2020, and April 11, 2020. A total of 509 responses were collected from 18 countries, mainly from the United States (51%) and Italy (36%). Operators reported significant decline in coronary, structural heart, and endovascular procedure volumes. Personal protective equipment was available to 95% of respondents; however FIT-tested N95 or equivalent masks were available to only 70%, and 74% indicated absence of coronavirus disease 2019 pretesting. Most (83%) operators expressed concern when asked to perform cardiac catheterization on a suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 patient, primarily because of fear of viral transmission (88%). Although the survey demonstrated significant compliance with social distancing, high use of telemedicine (69%), and online education platforms (80%), there was concern over impending financial loss. Conclusions Our survey indicates significant reduction in invasive procedure volumes and concern for viral transmission. There is near universal adoption of personal protective equipment; however, coronavirus disease 2019 pretesting and access to FIT-tested N95 masks is suboptimal. Although there is concern over impending financial loss, substantial engagement in telemedicine and online education is reported.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAdultCardiac CatheterizationCardiologyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleGlobal HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairescatheterization laboratorycoronavirus disease 2019COVID‐19survey

Identifiers

PMID32515254
PMCPMC7792243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.