Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32515058›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of clinical psychology2020

Randomized controlled trial of social cognition and interaction training compared to befriending group.

Frances Dark, James G Scott, Andrea Baker, Stephen Parker, Anne Gordon, Ellie Newman, Victoria Gore-Jones, Carmen C W Lim, Lyndall Jones, David L Penn

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anosognosia in schizophrenia.CNS spectrums · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frances DarkMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-207X
James G ScottFaculty of Medicine, Level 3 UQ Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Andrea BakerQueensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Clinical Support Unit, The Park-Centre for Mental Health, Archerfield, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen ParkerPostgraduate Training in Psychiatry, Addiction and Mental Health Services I Metro South Health Blg 23, Garden City Office Park, Eight Mile Plains, Queensland, Australia.
Anne GordonEarly Psychosis Service, Metro North Mental Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Ellie NewmanSt Kilda Road Clinic Community Adult Mental Health, Alfred Psychiatry, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Victoria Gore-JonesMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Carmen C W LimQueensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Clinical Support Unit, The Park-Centre for Mental Health, Archerfield, Queensland, Australia.
Lyndall JonesPine Rivers Community Health Centre, Strathpine, Queensland, Australia.
David L PennDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Queensland Centre for Mental Health ResearchQueensland Health Department
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeficits in social cognition are common in people with schizophrenia and are associated with impaired functioning. Finding effective interventions to address these deficits is a priority. Social Cognition Interaction Training (SCIT) is a psychosocial intervention that has demonstrated acceptability and feasibility in various health care settings. Larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the effectiveness of this intervention.

designA randomized controlled trial.

methodsOne hundred and twenty adults diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder were randomized to receive SCIT (n = 61) or Befriending Therapy (BT) (n = 59). Both intervention groups were delivered weekly for 2 hr over 12 weeks. Neurocognitive assessment was completed at baseline. Participants completed assessments of social cognition, social functioning, and meta-cognition at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up.

resultsThere were no clinically significant differences between group outcomes on any measure of social cognition or social functioning. There was a trend for both groups to improve over time but not at a level of statistical significance.

conclusionsSCIT did not show any additional benefits on measures of social cognition compared to Befriending Therapy for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The findings are discussed in terms of potential improvements to the programme. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Effective interventions for the social cognitive deficits of schizophrenia spectrum disorders are still being refined. Social Cognition Interaction Training is a promising therapy but requires further modifications to improve its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Social CognitionAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleSchizophreniarandomized controlled trialschizophrenia spectrum disorderssocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID32515058
PMCPMC7496415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.