Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32515055›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2020

Application of Whole-Genome Sequences and Machine Learning in Source Attribution of Salmonella Typhimurium.

Nanna Munck, Patrick Murigu Kamau Njage, Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon, Eva Litrup, Tine Hald

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence in food safety.NPJ science of food · 2026
    Review
  3. Impact of Farm Management Practices onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Source attribution of humanFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nanna MunckResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1133-6282
Patrick Murigu Kamau NjageResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4364-5314
Pimlapas LeekitcharoenphonResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-0142
Eva LitrupStatens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5463-7619
Tine HaldResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1115-9792
Technical University of Denmark · DKStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 643476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention of the emergence and spread of foodborne diseases is an important prerequisite for the improvement of public health. Source attribution models link sporadic human cases of a specific illness to food sources and animal reservoirs. With the next generation sequencing technology, it is possible to develop novel source attribution models. We investigated the potential of machine learning to predict the animal reservoir from which a bacterial strain isolated from a human salmonellosis case originated based on whole-genome sequencing. Machine learning methods recognize patterns in large and complex data sets and use this knowledge to build models. The model learns patterns associated with genetic variations in bacteria isolated from the different animal reservoirs. We selected different machine learning algorithms to predict sources of human salmonellosis cases and trained the model with Danish Salmonella Typhimurium isolates sampled from broilers (n = 34), cattle (n = 2), ducks (n = 11), layers (n = 4), and pigs (n = 159). Using cgMLST as input features, the model yielded an average accuracy of 0.783 (95% CI: 0.77-0.80) in the source prediction for the random forest and 0.933 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94) for the logit boost algorithm. Logit boost algorithm was most accurate (valid accuracy: 92%, CI: 0.8706-0.9579) and predicted the origin of 81% of the domestic sporadic human salmonellosis cases. The most important source was Danish produced pigs (53%) followed by imported pigs (16%), imported broilers (6%), imported ducks (2%), Danish produced layers (2%), Danish produced cattle and imported cattle (<1%) while 18% was not predicted. Machine learning has potential for improving source attribution modeling based on sequence data. Results of such models can inform risk managers to identify and prioritize food safety interventions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningWhole Genome SequencingAlgorithmsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticDisease ReservoirsGenes, BacterialHumansSalmonella typhimuriumMachine learningsource attributionwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32515055
PMCPMC7540586
OpenAlexW3033026974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.