Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514907›Full record

ReviewTargeted oncology2020

Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Laura L Michel, Alexandra von Au, Athanasios Mavratzas, Katharina Smetanay, Florian Schütz, Andreas Schneeweiss

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. PKCActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CD169Cancers · 2023
    Article
  10. Research progress of exosomes in drug resistance of breast cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura L MichelNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Laura.michel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7784-2826
Alexandra von AuNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Athanasios MavratzasNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina SmetanayNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian SchützNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer constitutes ~ 15% of all breast cancer subtypes. Because of the negative hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, therapy is mainly based on chemotherapy with a poor median overall survival in the metastatic setting of ~ 18 months. Compared to other breast cancer subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer is characterized by a higher mutational load, which renders the tumor immunogenic and amenable to immunotherapeutic intervention. Based on the promising results of immunotherapy in other cancer entities, including melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer, a vast number of studies are currently assessing immunotherapeutic approaches in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. While monotherapies with antibodies against programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1 have shown little efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, treatment efficacy likely depends on the therapeutic setting, the treatment line, and the combination of immunotherapies with other anticancer drugs. Several studies are currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, as well as radiotherapy in the metastatic and (neo-)adjuvant settings. The US Food and Drug Administration approval of nab-paclitaxel in combination with atezolizumab in 2019 presented a landmark therapeutic development for patients with triple-negative breast cancer, given the limited treatment options available for this highly aggressive disease. In this review, we provide an overview on important ongoing and completed immunotherapeutic studies in triple-negative breast cancer and their possible implications for clinical practice.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32514907
OpenAlexW3033554553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.