Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514900›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Middle-aged Women's Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Disclosure: "It's a private matter. It's an embarrassing situation".

Melissa E Dichter, Lena Makaroun, Anaïs Tuepker, Gala True, Ann Elizabeth Montgomery, Katherine Iverson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa E DichterCrescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. melissa.dichter@temple.edu.
Lena MakarounVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anaïs TuepkerVA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA.
Gala TrueSouth Central MIRECC, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Ann Elizabeth MontgomeryBirmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Katherine IversonWomen's Health Sciences Division of the National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Intimate Partner Violence: Patient Characteristics, Service Use and ExperiencesI01HX001905 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DICHTER, MELISSA E · 2019 to 2021
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001905NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827VA 15-142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines indicate that healthcare providers should routinely screen women of reproductive age for experience of intimate partner violence. We know little about intimate partner violence (IPV) screening and disclosure experience among women older than reproductive age.

objectiveTo examine the perspectives of middle-aged women who had experienced past-year IPV regarding IPV screening and disclosure in the healthcare setting.

designIndividual semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in-person as part of a larger study examining IPV screening and response services through the Veterans Health Administration.

participantsTwenty-seven women aged 45-64 (mean age 53) who experienced past-year IPV and received care at one of two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. APPROACH: Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Data were sorted and analyzed using templated notes and line-by-line coding, based on codes developed by the study team through an initial review of the data. Themes were derived from further analysis of the data coded for "screening" and "disclosure" for respondents aged 45 and older. KEY

resultsBarriers to disclosure of IPV to a healthcare provider included as follows: (a) feelings of shame, stigma, and/or embarrassment about experiencing IPV; (b) screening context not feeling comfortable or supportive, including lack of comfort with or trust in the provider and/or a perception that screening was conducted in a way that felt impersonal and uncaring; and (c) concerns about privacy and safety related to disclosure. Provider demonstrations of care, empathy, and support facilitated disclosure and feelings of empowerment following disclosure.

conclusionsMiddle-aged women may benefit from routine IPV screening and response in the healthcare setting. Such interventions should be sensitive to concerns regarding stigma and privacy that may be prevalent among this population.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceDisclosureFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSocial Stigmaintimate partner violencemiddle-agedveterans

Identifiers

PMID32514900
PMCPMC7458990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.