ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Arrhythmia insensitive rapid cardiac T1 mapping: comparison to modified look locker inversion recovery T1 mapping in mitral valve prolapse patients.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compare a saturation recovery arrhythmia insensitive rapid (AIR) T1 mapping technique which is less sensitive to heart rate and requires shorter breath-holds to modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping in patients with mitral valve prolapse. 55 patients underwent AIR and MOLLI at 1.5 T. AIR and MOLLI-derived blood and myocardial T1 values and extracellular volume (ECV) were measured by two independent readers. T1 values and ECV from both techniques and inter-reader agreement were compared with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCC) and reduced major axis regression. T1 values were consistently overestimated for AIR compared to MOLLI and vice versa for ECV. In the mitral valve prolapse population, mean native and post contrast myocardial T1 value for MOLLI were 1000 ± 40 ms and 411.9 ± 44.2 ms respectively and 1090.6 ± 58.7 ms and 488.2 ± 45.7 ms for AIR. Mean native and post contrast blood T1 values for MOLLI were 1566.6 ± 72.3 ms and 276.6 ± 34.1 ms respectively versus 1657.2 ± 180.9 ms and 294.9 ± 35.6 ms for AIR. AIR underestimated ECV relative to MOLLI (23.5 ± 0.4% vs 27.7 ± 0.4%). We found excellent inter-reader agreement (LCC all > 0.94, p < 0.0001) for both AIR and MOLLI techniques as well as intra-reader reliability (LCC all > 0.97, p < 0.0001). AIR can be performed in patients with mitral valve prolapse with excellent inter and intra-reader agreement, with higher T1 values compared to MOLLI, in line with other saturation recovery techniques. A consistent T1 mapping technique should be used when performing serial imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.