ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Evaluating Different Methodologies for Bioprospecting Actinomycetes in Canary Islands Soils.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Rhizobacteria Strains on Plant Growth Promotion in Tomatoes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Kribbellichelins A and B, Two New Antibiotics fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization of Bioactive Actinomycetes Isolated from Kadolkele Mangrove Sediments, Sri Lanka.Polish journal of microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Actinomycetes are a wide group of Gram positive prokaryotes, the soil being their most characteristic habitat, where they play important ecological functions. Their immense biotechnological potential as producers of bioactive molecules of great commercial and industrial interest is exemplified by most antibiotics for clinical use being derived from this group of bacteria. In this work several methodologies and culture media were tested for the isolation of actinomycetes in soils from three different edafoclimatic areas of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain): an arid zone of the southeast coast of the island, a humid area in the laurel forest and the Canary high mountain. The results of this work evidenced that just an air drying of the sample during 7 days (pretreatment) produces high counts of actinomycetes versus non-actinomycetes in the three soils and in any of the culture media studied, making unnecessary post physical and chemical treatments. However, the only method that produced an exclusive isolation of actinomycetes was the use of 0.22-μm filters as a physical barrier, and hence being a tool of unquestionable utility to estimate actinomycetes populations in soil.The analysis by BOX rep-PCR determined that the richness and genetic diversity of the isolates of these localities are very high. The greatest similarities were, with one exception, found between strains from the same locations. Izaña was one that obtained the highest diversity. Regarding the biotecnology potential as antibiotic produces isolates from Güimar soils are the most promising as 7 out of 10 isolates showed some antibiotic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32514780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.