Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514728›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

A pilot study using a machine-learning approach of morphological and hemodynamic parameters for predicting aneurysms enhancement.

Nan Lv, Christof Karmonik, Zhaoyue Shi, Shiyue Chen, Xinrui Wang, Jianmin Liu, Qinghai Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nan LvDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Christof KarmonikTranslational Imaging Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA. ckarmonik@houstonmethodist.org.
Zhaoyue ShiTranslational Imaging Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Shiyue ChenDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xinrui WangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jianmin LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qinghai HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Changhai Hospital · CNHouston Methodist · USSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701775National Research and Development Project of Key Chronic Diseases 2016YFC1300700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe development of straightforward classification methods is needed to identify unstable aneurysms and rupture risk for clinical use. In this study, we aim to investigate the relative importance of geometrical, hemodynamic and clinical risk factors represented by the PHASES score for predicting aneurysm wall enhancement using several machine-learning (ML) models.

methodsNine different ML models were applied to 65 aneurysm cases with 24 predictor variables. ML models were optimized with the training set using tenfold cross-validation with five repeats with the area under the curve (AUC) as cost parameter. Models were validated using the test set. Accuracy being significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the non-information rate (NIR) was used as measure of performance. The relative importance of the predictor variables was determined from a subset of five ML models in which this information was available.

resultsBest-performing ML model was based on gradient boosting (AUC = 0.98). Second best-performing model was based on generalized linear modeling (AUC = 0.80). The size ratio was determined as the dominant predictor for wall enhancement followed by the PHASES score and mean wall shear stress value at the aneurysm wall. Four ML models exhibited a statistically significant higher accuracy (0.79) than the NIR (0.58): random forests, generalized linear modeling, gradient boosting and linear discriminant analysis.

conclusionsML models are capable of predicting the relative importance of geometrical, hemodynamic and clinical parameters for aneurysm wall enhancement. Size ratio, PHASES score and mean wall shear stress value at the aneurysm wall are of highest importance when predicting wall enhancement in cerebral aneurysms.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAneurysm, RupturedFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial AneurysmLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsStress, MechanicalAneurysm wall enhancementMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID32514728
OpenAlexW3032949411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.