Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514726›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Knowledge, Practice, and Skills in Cytology-Based Cervical Cancer Screening: Impact Assessment of Training Workshop for the Pathologists.

Ruchika Gupta, Neeta Kumar, Neelam Sood, Akhileshwar Sharda, Dinesh Kumar, Sanjay Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Role of Scientific Societies in Continuing Education in Cytopathology: Present and Future Perspectives.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruchika GuptaDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, 201301, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0235-063X
Neeta KumarDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, India.
Neelam SoodDepartment of Pathology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Akhileshwar ShardaDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, 201301, India.
Dinesh KumarDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, 201301, India.
Sanjay GuptaDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, 201301, India. sanjaydr17@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a paucity of trained cytopathologists in low-resource settings for effective cervical cancer screening. There has been no documented report of the impact of a dedicated training program in cervical cytology on pathologists' knowledge and skill in this field. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the regularly conducted training workshops on the attending pathologists' knowledge, practice, and skills in cervicovaginal smear reporting. Our institute, a premier cancer research institute, has conducted 10 cytology-based cervical cancer screening workshops for pathologists with pre- and post-training evaluation using sets of digital images and a questionnaire (knowledge score). Additionally, feedback on diagnostic skills was taken at a 1-month and 6-month interval post-workshop using a separate set of digital images of cervical lesions. A Google form-based questionnaire was designed to seek the participants' feedback on the perceived improvement in knowledge and skills. All the data thus collected were analyzed to assess the efficacy of these workshops in imparting the desired knowledge and skills. A total of 350 participants were enrolled in these workshops. The average knowledge score improved from 10.56 (± 3.23) in the pre-training questionnaire to 21.17 (± 2.41) in the post-training evaluation, making a 100.5% increase (P < 0.001). Similarly, the diagnostic accuracy on digital images was enhanced from 8.6 (± 2.12) to 19.5 (± 4.28) immediately post-training and was maintained at 17.6 (± 3.87) at 1-month and 16.4 (± 4.26) at a 6-month interval (P < 0.001). The majority of the participants reported fair to a marked improvement in their knowledge, practice, and confidence in reporting cervical cytology in the response to form-based questionnaire. One-fifth of the responders also acknowledged the assistance of the knowledge gained during the workshop in refinement or initiation of cervical cytology at their set-up. Our experience of conducting these regular workshops demonstrates the utility of such training programs in human resource development in the field of cervical cytology for enhancement of cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePathologistsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEducationFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesVaginal SmearsCervical cytologyImpactKnowledgePathologistsSkillsTrainingWorkshop

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.