Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514689›Full record

SynthesisArchives of virology2020

The potential of drug repositioning as a short-term strategy for the control and treatment of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2): a systematic review.

William Gustavo Lima, Júlio César Moreira Brito, Joerg Overhage, Waleska Stephanie da Cruz Nizer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Is there any potential management against COVID-19? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Canakinumab as treatment for COVID-19-related pneumonia: A prospective case-control study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Present and future treatment strategies for coronavirus disease 2019.Future journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. SARS-CoV-2 and interferon blockade.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020
    Review
  18. The under-reported role of toxic substance exposures in the COVID-19 pandemic.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Tracking and Mining the COVID-19 Research Literature.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William Gustavo LimaResearcher of the Group (CNPq) for Epidemiological, Economic and Pharmacological Studies of Arboviruses (EEPIFARBO), Marabá, Brazil. williamgustavofarmacia@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-9363
Júlio César Moreira BritoResearcher of the Group (CNPq) for Epidemiological, Economic and Pharmacological Studies of Arboviruses (EEPIFARBO), Marabá, Brazil.
Joerg OverhageCarleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Waleska Stephanie da Cruz NizerCarleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel human coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, has quickly become a threat to the public health and economy worldwide. Despite the severity of some cases, there are no current pathogen-specific antivirals available to treat the disease. Therefore, many studies have focused on the evaluation of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of clinically available drugs. Here, we conducted a systematic review to describe the drug repositioning strategy against SARS-CoV-2 and to discuss the clinical impact of this approach in the current pandemic context. The systematic review was performed on March 23, 2020, using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS). The data were summarized in tables and critically analyzed. After the database search, 12 relevant studies were identified as eligible for the review. Among the drugs reported in these studies, 57 showed some evidence of antiviral activity. Antivirals, especially antiretrovirals, are the main class of therapeutic agents evaluated against COVID-19. Moreover, studies have reported the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of antitumor (16%; 9/57), antimalarial (7%, 4/57), and antibacterial (5%; 3/57) agents. Additionally, seven pharmacological agents (chloroquine, tetrandrine, umifenovir (arbidol), carrimycin, damageprevir, lopinavir/ritonavir) are in phase IV of clinical trials. Due to the evidence of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of various clinically available agents, drug repositioning stands out as a promising strategy for a short-term response in the fight against the novel coronavirus.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimalarialsAntineoplastic AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimalarialsAntineoplastic AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID32514689
PMCPMC7276657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.