Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514670›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Day-case robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: feasibility and preliminary results of a prospective evaluation (UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study).

Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Grégoire Robert, Solène Ricard, Clément Michiels, Grégoire Capon, Astrid Boulenger de Hautecloque, Henri Bensadoun, Joséphine Gay, Julien Rogier, Patrick Tauzin-Fin and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03293563 (UroCCR Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03293563 recruitingnot on this map

UroCCR Database: French Research Network for Kidney Cancer (National Multidisciplinary Clinical and Biological Database on Kidney Cancer)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2011 to 2040Enrolled30,000ConditionsKidney CancerArmsRadical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy (according surgeon judgement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jean-Christophe BernhardDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France. Jean-christophe.bernhard@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-1699
Grégoire RobertDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Solène RicardDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Clément MichielsDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Grégoire CaponDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Astrid Boulenger de HautecloqueDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Henri BensadounDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Joséphine GayDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Julien RogierDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick Tauzin-FinDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marine Gross-GoupilDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Antoine BenardMethodology Unit, Public Health Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Karine NouetteDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Stéphanie RoulletDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Marie FerrièreDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRobotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a minimally-invasive technique used to treat renal tumors. A clinical pathway and prospective research protocol (AMBU-REIN) were specifically set up to establish and assess the routine use of day-case RPN.

methodsThe AMBU-REIN study was conducted in the framework of the French research network on kidney cancer UroCCR (NCT03293563). We present our initial experience of patients treated using day-case RPN and released from our hospital on the same day, focusing on patient selection, safety and patient satisfaction using the EVAN-G validated questionnaire.

resultsBetween September 2016 and September 2019, 429 RPN were performed and 82 patients were consecutively selected for day-case RPN. Patients were managed using transperitoneal RPN with off-clamp tumorectomy for 66/82 cases. Mean tumor size was 2.7 ± 1.2 cm. There were no immediate severe postoperative complications; 7/82 patients were kept under observation overnight and discharged the following day. The follow-up at day 30 indicated postoperative complications, readmissions, and mortality rates of 1.2, 1.2, and 0%, respectively. Next-day patient satisfaction questionnaires indicated that patients were generally highly satisfied, with a mean ± standard deviation global score of 83.6 ± 10.3%. "Attention" was rated the highest overall (mean 94.8 ± 10.5%), while "pain management" scored the lowest (61.2 ± 20.5%).

conclusionsThis prospective case series is the first to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of day-case RPN. For selected patients and through a dedicated, nurse-led clinical pathway, it provided a high level of patient satisfaction. Expected benefits on healthcare cost savings warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesHumansNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDay-case surgeryKidney cancerOutpatientPartial nephrectomyRenal tumorsRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.