Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514661›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Predictors of individual variation in reversal learning performance in three-spined sticklebacks.

Miles K Bensky, Alison M Bell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Smart mating: the cognitive ability of females influences their preference for male cognitive ability.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  11. Range expansion during recolonization: what does animal personality have to do with it?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miles K BenskyProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. bensky2@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9776-2981
Alison M BellProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Using sticklebacks as a model for identifying genes related to risk- taking behavR01GM082937 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELL, ALISON MARIE · 2008 to 2018
$2.9M
MIRA: The biological basis of paternal care in stickleback fishR35GM139597 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELL, ALISON MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
National Science Foundation 1121980NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082937NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139597NIH HHS 2R01GM082937-06A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral flexibility is a type of phenotypic plasticity that can influence how animals cope with environmental change and is often measured with a reversal learning paradigm. The goal of this study was to understand why individuals differ in behavioral flexibility, and whether individual differences in behavioral flexibility fit the predictions of coping styles theory. We tested whether individual variation in flexibility correlates with response to novelty (response to a novel object), boldness (emergence into a novel environment), and behavioral persistence (response to a barrier), and tested for trade-offs between how quickly individuals learn an initial discrimination and flexibility. We compare results when reversal learning performance is measured during an early step of reversal learning (e.g. the number of errors during the first reversal session) to when reversal learning performance is measured by time to criterion. Individuals that made fewer mistakes during an early step of reversal learning spent more time away from the novel object, were less bold, less persistent, and performed worse during initial discrimination learning. In contrast, time to criterion was not correlated with any of the behaviors measured. This result highlights the utility of dissecting the steps of reversal learning to better understand variation in behavioral flexibility. Altogether, this study suggests that individuals differ in flexibility because flexibility is a key ingredient to their overall integrated strategy for coping with environmental challenges.

Indexed as

Reversal LearningSmegmamorphaAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionDiscrimination LearningAnimal cognitionAnimal personalityFlexibilityIndividual differencesPersistenceReversal learningThree-spined stickleback

Identifiers

PMID32514661
PMCPMC12060797
OpenAlexW3033474587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.