Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514651›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Travel Patterns among Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection in California: Does Driving Further for Care Improve Outcomes?

Adrian Diaz, Jordan M Cloyd, Andrei Manilchuk, Mary Dillhoff, Joel Beane, Allan Tsung, Aslam Ejaz, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrian DiazThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Adridndi@med.umich.edu.
Jordan M CloydThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Andrei ManilchukThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mary DillhoffThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joel BeaneThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Allan TsungThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aslam EjazThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Timothy M PawlikThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4828-8096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter outcomes at high-volume surgical centers have driven regionalization of complex surgical care. In turn, access to high-volume centers often requires travel over longer distances. We sought to characterize travel patterns among patients who underwent a hepatectomy.

methodsThe California Office of Statewide Health Planning database was used to identify patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2005 and 2016. Total distance traveled and whether a patient bypassed the nearest hospital that performed hepatectomy to get to a higher-volume center were assessed. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with bypassing a local hospital for a higher-volume center.

resultsOverall, 13,379 adults underwent a hepatectomy in 229 hospitals; only 26 hospitals were high volume (> 15 cases/year). Median travel time to a hospital that performed hepatectomy was 25.2 min (IQR: 13.1-52.0). The overwhelming majority of patients (91.6%) bypassed the nearest providing hospital to seek care at a destination hospital. Among patients who bypassed a closer hospital, 75.5% went to a high-volume hospital. Outcomes at destination hospitals were improved compared with nearest hospitals (incidence of complications: 20.4% vs. 22.9% %; failure-to-rescue: 7.1% vs 10.9%; mortality 1.5% vs. 2.6%). Medicaid beneficiaries (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.56-0.85) were less likely to bypass the nearest hospital to go to a high-volume hospital; additionally, Medicaid patients were less likely to undergo hepatectomy at a high-volume hospital independent of bypassing the nearest hospital (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.48-0.76). Among the 3703 patients who underwent hepatectomy at a low-volume center, 2126 patients had actually bypassed a high-volume hospital. Among the remaining 1577 patients, 95% of individuals would have needed to travel less than 1 additional hour to reach a high-volume center.

conclusionRoughly, one-quarter of patients undergoing hepatectomy received care at a low-volume center; nearly all of these patients either bypassed a high-volume hospital or would have needed to travel less than an additional hour to reach a high-volume center. Travel distance needs to be considered in policies and healthcare delivery design to improve care of patients undergoing hepatic resection.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHospitals, High-VolumeAdultCaliforniaHepatectomyHumansTravelUnited StatesAccessHepatectomySurgeryTravel

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.