ArticleParasitology research2020
Efficiency comparison of experimental fosfatriclaben with three commercial fasciolicides in experimentally infected sheep.
Article in Parasitology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Field study on the determination of the effective dose of injectable fosfatriclaben prodrug in sheep naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica.Parasitology research · 2022Article
- Assessment of anthelmintic effectiveness to controlParasitology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we compare and evaluate the efficiency of fosfatriclaben with three commercial fasciolicides in experimentally infected sheep. Fosfatriclaben is a novel prodrug derived from triclabendazole; it is highly water-soluble with excellent aqueous stability at pH 7, properties that make it ideal for developing intramuscular pharmaceutical compositions in the form of solutions. In order to compare, 30 mixed breed sheep, previously diagnosed negative to fluke eggs, were infected with 200 metacercariae of Fasciola hepatica, twice. Five groups of six animals/each were formed for treatments. Group 1 (G1) was treated with closantel 5% injectable at 5 mg/kg subcutaneously, G2 with clorsulon at 2 mg/kg subcutaneously, G3 with triclabendazole at 12 mg/kg per os, G4 with fosfatriclaben at 6 mg/kg intramuscularly (dose equivalent to triclabendazole content), and G5 remained as the non-treated control. On day 110, fecal samples were examined to determine the percentage of egg reduction after treatment, and sheep were humanely euthanized. The livers were collected, the flukes were extracted, measured, and counted. Efficiency in egg reduction was of 86.8, 90.5, 98.4, and 97.3% for closantel, clorsulon, triclabendazole, and fosfatriclaben, respectively, and efficiency against flukes was of 96.2, 91.9, 99.4, and 95.7%, respectively. No statistical differences were found between treatments. It is concluded that fosfatriclaben at 6 mg/kg intramuscularly presented a high fasciolicide efficiency, similar to the best commercial fasciolicides, having advantage over its predecessor since it uses half of the dose required by triclabendazole to remove flukes in sheep under study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32514648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.