ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021
Long-term outcomes and safety after reirradiation in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic models for radiation-induced complications after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Prospective randomized clinical studies involving reirradiation: update of a systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Pooled it
- Recognizing cisplatin as a potential radiation recall trigger: case report and focused systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Pooled it
- Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Freedom from Cancer Recurrence Rate.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Treatment of loco-regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area: oncologic outcomes, morbidity, and proposal of a prognostic nomogram.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Fractionation or tumor factors-what matters in carotid blowout syndrome?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine outcomes and toxicities after reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) and to apply a prognostic index in a non-endemic region.
methodsWe retrospectively reported progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities in patients treated with curative intent for locally rNPC. We applied the prognostic model for OS and grade 5 radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities published by Li et al. and evaluated its prognostic accuracy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
resultsBetween 2005 and 2018, 33 patients were treated for rNPC in our institution. Median follow-up was 60 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 75 months. Six (18%) patients had a persistent grade 3 toxicity from a previous RT course. The median re-RT dose was 66 Gy. After re-RT, 13 patients had local failure and 3 patients had metastatic recurrence. Median PFS was 18 months with a 5-year PFS rate of 29%. Median OS was 35 months with a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities rate was 74%. There were 21% grade 5 toxicities. The median time to a grade 5 toxicity was less than 6 months following re-RT. The prognostic nomogram was not predictive for OS or grade 5 toxicities.
conclusionReirradiation of rNPC is an effective treatment but is associated with a high rate of life-threatening toxicity. Stratification of patients based on their risk of developing severe toxicity is needed to select patients who will most likely benefit from re-RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.