ReviewHerz2020
[Clinical implications of the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction].
Review in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Gensini Score and Left Ventricular Thrombus in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Biology of Cardiac Troponins: Emphasis on Metabolism.Biology · 2022Review
- The Importance of Cardiac Troponin Metabolism in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction (Comprehensive Review).BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Metabolic Pathway of Cardiospecific Troponins: From Fundamental Aspects to Diagnostic Role (Comprehensive Review).Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- The clinical features and prognosis of type 4C myocardial infarction in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This disease with its multiple ischemic and non-ischemic manifestations is classified based on the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI). An acute myocardial injury is defined as a significant increase of cardiac troponins (cTn). In patients with an additional myocardial ischemia, which is defined by certain clinical, electrocardiographic, imaging and angiographic criteria, the diagnosis of acute MI can be made. Etiologically, MI can be divided into 5 types: type 1 ischemic by plaque rupture or plaque erosion with thrombus formation, type 2 imbalance between myocardial oxygen demand and supply, type 3 MI as suspected cause of death before determination of cTn, type 4a <48 h after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), type 4b stent thrombosis, type 4c in-stent stenosis and type 5 <48 h after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This classification reflects the heterogeneity of acute MI. Based on clearly defined criteria the guidelines attempt to provide clinically active physicians with assistance in the diagnosis and treatment of this specific disease. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to take a holistic view of the patient with all the individual characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.