Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514384›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2020

Use of simulation as a needs assessment to develop a focused team leader training curriculum for resuscitation teams.

Susan Coffey Zern, William J Marshall, Patricia A Shewokis, Michael T Vest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Going in Blind: A Common Scenario in an Uncommon Situation.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old).Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan Coffey ZernVirtual Education and Simulation Training (VEST) Center, Christiana Care Health System, 4755 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Ammon MEC LE86B, Newark, Delaware 19718 USA.
William J MarshallVirtual Education and Simulation Training (VEST) Center, Christiana Care Health System, 4755 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Ammon MEC LE86B, Newark, Delaware 19718 USA.
Patricia A ShewokisNutrition Sciences Department, College of Nursing and Health Professions; School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, and Department of Teaching, Learning & Curriculum, School of Education, Drexel University, 3rd Floor, Room 382, Parkway Building, 1601 Cherry Street, Mail Stop 31030, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA.
Michael T VestDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, 4755 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Medical Intensive Care Unit, 3E, Newark, Delaware 19713 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-6095
Christiana Care Health System · USNutrition Sciences (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany inpatients experience cardiac arrest and mortality in this population is extremely high. Simulation is frequently used to train code teams with the goal of improving these outcomes. A key step in designing such a training curriculum is to perform a needs assessment. We report on the effectiveness of a simulation-based training program for residents designed using unannounced in-situ simulation cardiac arrest data as a needs assessment.

methodsIn order to develop the curriculum for training, a needs assessment was done using in-situ simulation. Prior to instruction, residents were assessed in their ability to lead a simulated resuscitation using a standardized checklist. During the intervention phase, residents participated in didactic and team training. The didactic training consisted of pharmacology review, ACLS update and TeamSTEPPS training. Residents took turns as code team leader in three simulation sessions. Rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) was employed as part of simulation sessions. All residents returned, for post-intervention assessment. Mean pre-post test scores were analyzed to determine if there was a significant difference.

resultsTwenty-seven residents participated. Mean pre-training assessment score was 47.6 (95% CI 37.5-57.9). The mean post-training assessment score was 84.4 (95% CI 79.0-89.5). The mean time to defibrillation after pads were placed in scenario with shockable rhythm decreased from 102.2 seconds (95% CI 74.0-130.5) to 56.3 (95% CI 32.7-79.8).

conclusionUsing unannounced in-situ cardiac arrest simulations as a needs assessment, a simulation-based training program was developed that significantly improved resident performance as team leader. Future work is needed to determine if this improvement translates into patient benefits and is sustainable. However, in-situ simulation is a promising tool for curriculum development.

Indexed as

Advanced Cardiac Life SupportCardiac Arrestcurriculum developmentgap analysisMedical Educationneeds assessmentTeam Training

Identifiers

PMID32514384
PMCPMC7251806
OpenAlexW3031405285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.