Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514375›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2020

Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities.

Jason M Beneciuk, Dorothy Verstandig, Chuck Taylor, Doug Scott, Joan Levin, Raine Osborne, Joel E Bialosky, Trevor A Lentz, Tava Buck, Anita L Davis and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jason M BeneciukDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida USA.
Dorothy VerstandigPatient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Chuck TaylorPatient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Doug ScottPatient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Joan LevinPatient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Raine OsborneBrooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Joel E BialoskyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida USA.
Trevor A LentzDuke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Tava BuckMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Anita L DavisBrooks Rehabilitation Behavioral Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Christina HarderBrooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Monika B BeneciukBrooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Virgil WittmerBrooks Rehabilitation Behavioral Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
James SylvesterCommunity partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Robert RoweBrooks Rehabilitation, Institute of Higher Learning, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
David McInnesSt. Vincent's Family Medicine Residency Program, Ascension St. Vincent's, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
Tad P FisherFlorida Physical Therapy Association, Tallahassee, Florida USA.
Lisa McGarrieGeorgia Health Policy Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Brooks Rehabilitation Clinical Research Center · USUniversity of Florida · USBrooks Institute · USClinical Research Institute · USGeorgia State University · USSt. Vincent's HealthCare · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a global public health problem with increased societal burden. Increased attention has focused toward patient and other stakeholder perspectives when determining future MSK pain research priorities, however infrastructure and capacity building within the community are needed for individuals and organizations to participate in patient-centered outcomes research. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our collaborative experiences with several MSK pain stakeholders and processes to identify a top priority research topic.

methodsLunch meetings and formalized workshops were used to develop infrastructure for engaging patients and other stakeholders with early capacity building for partners to identify MSK pain research ideas based on their personal experiences. Additional capacity building and engagement through literature searching further prepared partners to contribute informed decisions about MSK pain research topics and subsequent selection of an important research question.

resultsSeveral key deliverables (e.g., Governance Document, Communication Plan) were developed and completed over the course of this project to provide partnership structure. Other key deliverables included a list of preliminary comparative effectiveness research ideas (

conclusionsOur patient partners provided the catalyst for identifying shared decision making as a high priority research topic based on a wide spectrum of stakeholder perspectives and unique experiences. Patient partners were primarily identified using a single rehabilitation health system and clinician partners were heavily weighted by physical therapists which may have introduced selection bias.

Indexed as

CommunicationMusculoskeletal painPatient and public involvementShared decision makingStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID32514375
PMCPMC7268422
OpenAlexW3033293534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.