Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514331›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2020

Differential cellular proliferation underlies heterochronic generation of cranial diversity in phyllostomid bats.

Jasmin Camacho, Rachel Moon, Samantha K Smith, Jacky D Lin, Charles Randolph, John J Rasweiler, Richard R Behringer, Arhat Abzhanov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary mechanisms modulating the mammalian skull development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasmin CamachoDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-9224
Rachel MoonDepartment of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Samantha K SmithDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
Jacky D LinDepartment of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Charles RandolphDepartment of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
John J RasweilerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
Richard R BehringerDepartment of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Arhat AbzhanovDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY UK.
Harvard University · USNatural History Museum · GBSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Super-Resolution ImagingP30NS072030 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2011 to 2020
$5.8M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS072030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkull diversity in the neotropical leaf-nosed bats (Phyllostomidae) evolved through a heterochronic process called peramorphosis, with underlying causes varying by subfamily. The nectar-eating (subfamily Glossophaginae) and blood-eating (subfamily Desmondontinae) groups originate from insect-eating ancestors and generate their uniquely shaped faces and skulls by extending the ancestral ontogenetic program, appending new developmental stages and demonstrating peramorphosis by hypermorphosis. However, the fruit-eating phyllostomids (subfamilies Carollinae and Stenodermatinae) adjust their craniofacial development by speeding up certain developmental processes, displaying peramorphosis by acceleration. We hypothesized that these two forms of peramorphosis detected by our morphometric studies could be explained by differential growth and investigated cell proliferation during craniofacial morphogenesis.

resultsWe obtained cranial tissues from four wild-caught bat species representing a range of facial diversity and labeled mitotic cells using immunohistochemistry. During craniofacial development, all bats display a conserved spatiotemporal distribution of proliferative cells with distinguishable zones of elevated mitosis. These areas were identified as modules by the spatial distribution analysis. Ancestral state reconstruction of proliferation rates and patterns in the facial module between species provided support, and a degree of explanation, for the developmental mechanisms underlying the two models of peramorphosis. In the long-faced species,

conclusionsThis is the first study which links differential cellular proliferation and developmental modularity with heterochronic developmental changes, leading to the evolution of adaptive cranial diversity in an important group of mammals.

Indexed as

BatCell proliferationCraniofacialDevelopmentEvolutionHeterochronyMorphology

Identifiers

PMID32514331
PMCPMC7268441
OpenAlexW3032943487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.