Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514289›Full record

ReviewChinese medicine2020

Recent advances of novel technologies for quality consistency assessment of natural herbal medicines and preparations.

Xi-Chuan Wei, Bo Cao, Chuan-Hong Luo, Hao-Zhou Huang, Peng Tan, Xiao-Rong Xu, Run-Chun Xu, Ming Yang, Yi Zhang, Li Han and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Authentication ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Quality Evaluation and Antioxidant Activity of CultivatedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xi-Chuan WeiSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Bo CaoSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Chuan-Hong LuoSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Hao-Zhou HuangSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Peng TanSichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610041 China.
Xiao-Rong XuSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Run-Chun XuSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Ming YangJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004 China.
Yi ZhangChengdu Food and Drug Control, Chengdu, 610000 China.
Li HanSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.
Ding-Kun ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Characteristic Chinese Drug Resources in Southwest China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1066 Avenue. Liutai, Chengdu, 611137 China.ORCID 0000-0001-6746-3454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality consistency is one of the basic attributes of medicines, but it is also a difficult problem that natural medicines and their preparations must face. The complex chemical composition and comprehensive pharmacological action of natural medicines make it difficult to simply apply the commonly used evaluation methods in chemical drugs. It is thus urgent to explore the novel evaluation methods suitable for the characteristics of natural medicines. With the rapid development of analytical techniques and the deepening understanding of the quality of natural herbs, increasing numbers of researchers have proposed many new ideas and technologies. This review mainly focuses on the basic principles, technical characteristics and application examples of the chemical evaluation, biological evaluation methods and their combination in quality consistency evaluation of natural herbs. On the bases of chemical evaluation and clinical efficacy, new methods reflecting their pharmacodynamic mechanism and safety characteristics will be developed, and gradually towards accurate quality control, to achieve the goal of quality consistency. We hope that this manuscript can provide new ideas and technical references for the quality consistency of natural drugs and their preparations, thus better guarantee their clinical efficacy and safety, and better promote industrial development.

Indexed as

Biological evaluationChemical–biological integration evaluationChemical evaluationNatural herbal medicinesQuality consistency assessment

Identifiers

PMID32514289
PMCPMC7268247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.