Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514199›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2020

Cost-effectiveness of emergency care interventions in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Kalin Werner, Nicholas Risko, Taylor Burkholder, Kenneth Munge, Lee Wallis, Teri Reynolds

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Barriers to Trauma Care in South and Central America: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ultrasonographic evaluation of tendon injuries in hand trauma: a crucial tool for emergency care.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Determining the research priorities for emergency care within the Western Cape province of South Africa: A consensus study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kalin WernerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, F51-62, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Nicholas RiskoJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, United States of America (USA).
Taylor BurkholderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Kenneth MungeKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Lee WallisDepartment of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, F51-62, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Teri ReynoldsDepartment for Clinical Services and Systems, Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness analyses of emergency care interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed®, Scopus, EMBASE®, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for studies published before May 2019. Inclusion criteria were: (i) an original cost-effectiveness analysis of emergency care intervention or intervention package, and (ii) the analysis occurred in a low- and middle-income setting. To identify additional primary studies, we hand searched the reference lists of included studies. We used the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards guideline to appraise the quality of included studies.

resultsOf the 1674 articles we identified, 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified an additional four studies from the reference lists. We excluded many studies for being deemed costing assessments without an effectiveness analysis. Most included studies were single-intervention analyses. Emergency care interventions evaluated by included studies covered prehospital services, provider training, treatment interventions, emergency diagnostic tools and facilities and packages of care. The reporting quality of the studies varied.

conclusionWe found large gaps in the evidence surrounding the cost-effectiveness of emergency care interventions in low- and middle-income settings. Given the breadth of interventions currently in practice, many interventions remain unassessed, suggesting the need for future research to aid resource allocation decisions. In particular, packages of multiple interventions and system-level changes represent a priority area for future research.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesCost-Benefit AnalysisEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency TreatmentHumansIncome

Identifiers

PMID32514199
PMCPMC7265944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.