ArticleScientific reports2020
Clinical utility of early postoperative cardiac multidetector computed tomography after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Echocardiographic predictors of cardiac improvement following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Denoising Multiphase Functional Cardiac CT Angiography Using Deep Learning and Synthetic Data.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the clinical utility of early postoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT) for evaluating left ventricular (LV) function and predicting prognosis in patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Of the 205 patients who underwent CABG from March 2011 to December 2014, 136 underwent early postoperative cardiac CT (within 30 days after CABG) and were enrolled as the study population. The baseline and postoperative follow-up echocardiographic findings, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and death were recorded for a follow-up period (mean, 5.9 ± 1.1 years). Functional cardiac CT parameters were compared to echocardiographic measurements. The associations between cardiac CT findings and functional recovery and prognosis were evaluated by logistic regression analyses. The LVEF measured via cardiac CT was significantly higher (56.2 ± 11.5% vs. 61.9 ± 12.9%; p = 0.0002) compared to those via early postoperative echocardiography, but the wall motion score index (WMSI) was not significantly different (1.23 ± 0.33 vs. 1.21 ± 0.28, p = 0.5041) between the two methods. During the follow-up period, 17 patients (12.5%) died and 40 (29.4%) developed MACE. Both the LVEF and WMSI measured with early postoperative echocardiography (p = 0.0202 and odds ratio [OR] = 5.0171, p = 0.0039, respectively), and cardiac CT (OR = 0.9625, p = 0.0091 and OR = 14.3605, p = 0.0001, respectively) predicted MACE OR = 0.9630, but only the WMSI, measured using cardiac CT, predicted all-cause death (OR = 10.6017, p = 0.0035). In CABG patients, LVEF and the WMSI measured with early postoperative cardiac CT were comparable with echocardiography and predicted the development of MACE and all-cause death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.