Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513961›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Bayesian reassessment of the epigenetic architecture of complex traits.

Daniel Trejo Banos, Daniel L McCartney, Marion Patxot, Lucas Anchieri, Thomas Battram, Colette Christiansen, Ricardo Costeira, Rosie M Walker, Stewart W Morris, Archie Campbell and 13 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A blood- and brain-based EWAS of smoking.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Methylome-wide studies of six metabolic traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel Trejo BanosDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. daniel.trejobanos@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5268-5759
Daniel L McCartneyCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Marion PatxotDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-7786
Lucas AnchieriDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas BattramMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Colette ChristiansenDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
Ricardo CosteiraDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
Rosie M WalkerCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-4479
Stewart W MorrisCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Archie CampbellCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0198-5078
Qian ZhangInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David J PorteousCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1249-6106
Allan F McRaeInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Naomi R WrayInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-3357
Peter M VisscherInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2143-8760
Chris S HaleyMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-0210
Kathryn L EvansCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ian J DearyCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew M McIntoshCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-4588
Gibran HemaniMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0920-1055
Jordana T BellDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-5986
Riccardo E MarioniCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Matthew R RobinsonInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria. matthew.robinson@ist.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-8813
University of Edinburgh · GBThe University of Queensland · AUKing's College London · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Bristol · GBInstitute of Genetics and Cancer · GBInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATRoyal Edinburgh Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025263/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025751/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S020845/1Chief Scientist Office CZD/16/6Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0700704Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127592696Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/10Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/2Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Medical Research Council MR/M01311/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104036/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 208806/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking epigenetic marks to clinical outcomes improves insight into molecular processes, disease prediction, and therapeutic target identification. Here, a statistical approach is presented to infer the epigenetic architecture of complex disease, determine the variation captured by epigenetic effects, and estimate phenotype-epigenetic probe associations jointly. Implicitly adjusting for probe correlations, data structure (cell-count or relatedness), and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects, improves association estimates and in 9,448 individuals, 75.7% (95% CI 71.70-79.3) of body mass index (BMI) variation and 45.6% (95% CI 37.3-51.9) of cigarette consumption variation was captured by whole blood methylation array data. Pathway-linked probes of blood cholesterol, lipid transport and sterol metabolism for BMI, and xenobiotic stimuli response for smoking, showed >1.5 times larger associations with >95% posterior inclusion probability. Prediction accuracy improved by 28.7% for BMI and 10.2% for smoking over a LASSO model, with age-, and tissue-specificity, implying associations are a phenotypic consequence rather than causal.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableAdultAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBiomarkersBody Mass IndexComputer SimulationDNA MethylationHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationOrgan SpecificityReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32513961
PMCPMC7280277
OpenAlexW3033196647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.