Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513888›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Quality of maternal and newborn care in limited-resource settings: a facility-based cross-sectional study in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire.

Tieba Millogo, Marie Laurette Agbre-Yace, Raissa K Kourouma, W Maurice E Yaméogo, Akoua Tano-Kamelan, Fatou Bintou Sissoko, Aminata Soltié Koné-Coulibaly, Anna Thorson, Seni Kouanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tieba MillogoEpidemiology, African Institute of Public Health, Ouagadougou, Kadiogo, Burkina Faso millogorod@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-3789
Marie Laurette Agbre-YaceInstitut National de Santé Publique (INSP-Côte d'Ivoire), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Raissa K KouroumaInstitut National de Santé Publique (INSP-Côte d'Ivoire), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
W Maurice E YaméogoBiomedicine and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso.
Akoua Tano-KamelanInstitut National de Santé Publique (INSP-Côte d'Ivoire), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Fatou Bintou SissokoBiomedicine and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso.
Aminata Soltié Koné-CoulibalyInstitut National de Santé Publique (INSP-Côte d'Ivoire), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Anna ThorsonHuman Reproduction Program/World Health Organization (Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland.
Seni KouandaEpidemiology, African Institute of Public Health, Ouagadougou, Kadiogo, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess and compare the quality of intrapartum and immediate postpartum care across levels of healthcare in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire using validated process indicators.

designHealth facility-based cross-sectional study with direct observation of healthcare workers' practices while caring for mother-newborn pairs during intrapartum and immediate postpartum periods.

settingPrimary healthcare facilities and their corresponding referral hospitals in the Central-North region in Burkina Faso and the Agneby-Tiassa-Mé region in Côte d'Ivoire.

participantsHealthcare providers who care for mother-newborn pairs during intrapartum and immediate postpartum periods, the labouring women and their newborns after childbirth.

main outcome measuresAdherence to essential best practices (EBPs) at four pause points in each birth event and the overall quality score based on the level of adherence to the set of EBPs observed for a selected pause point.

resultsA total of 532 and 627 labouring women were included in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire, respectively. Overall, the compliance with EBPs was insufficient at all the four pause points, even though it varied widely from one EBP to another. The adherence was very low with respect to hand hygiene practices: the care provider wore sterile gloves for vaginal examination in only 7.96% cases (95% CI 5.66% to 11.06%) in Burkina Faso and the care provider washed hands before examination in 6.71% cases (95% CI 3.94% to 11.20%) in Côte d'Ivoire. The adherence was very high with respect to thermal management of newborns in both countries (>90%). The overall mean quality scores were consistently higher in referral hospitals in Burkina Faso at all pause points excluding immediate post partum.

conclusionsWomen delivering in healthcare facilities do not always receive proven EBPs needed to prevent poor childbirth outcomes. There is a need for quality improvement interventions.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMedically Underserved AreaPractice Guidelines as TopicBurkina FasoCote d'IvoireCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesPregnancyburkina fasoCôte d’Ivoirequality maternal and newborn care

Identifiers

PMID32513888
PMCPMC7282325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.