Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513816›Full record

ArticleGenetics2020

Efficient Transgenesis in

Michael L Nonet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Modular gene tagging inResearch square · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. TAG-IN, a swappable strategy for endogenous gene tagging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Modular gene tagging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. FLInt 2.0: Robust and customizable single shot integration inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. MLT-11 is necessary forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The actin assembly regulatorbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exclusion of the endoplasmic reticulum from themicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael L NonetDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 mnonetWU@gmail.com nonetm@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of CRISPR technology has greatly facilitated the creation of transgenic

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesRecombination, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCaenorhabditis elegansDNA NucleotidyltransferasesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsPlasmidsPromoter Regions, GeneticDNA NucleotidyltransferasesFLP recombinaseGreen Fluorescent Proteinsbipartite expression systemsCre recombinaseintegration

Identifiers

PMID32513816
PMCPMC7404237
OpenAlexW3033059448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.