Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513734›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Cryogenic single-molecule fluorescence annotations for electron tomography reveal in situ organization of key proteins in

Peter D Dahlberg, Saumya Saurabh, Annina M Sartor, Jiarui Wang, Patrick G Mitchell, Wah Chiu, Lucy Shapiro, W E Moerner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cryogenic electron tomography by the numbers: Charting underexplored lineages in structural cell biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cryogenic light microscopy of vitrified samples with angstrom precision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Time-deterministic cryo-optical microscopy.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative spatial analysis of chromatin biomolecular condensates using cryoelectron tomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances in correlative cryo-light and electron microscopy.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter D DahlbergDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Saumya SaurabhDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-7548
Annina M SartorDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Jiarui WangDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-0078-2191
Patrick G MitchellDivision of Cryo-EM and Bioimaging, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Wah ChiuDivision of Cryo-EM and Bioimaging, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025.ORCID 0000-0002-8910-3078
Lucy ShapiroDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
W E MoernerDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; wmoerner@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2830-209X
Stanford University · USSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · US

Funding

Project 3: TRiC modulation of CNS pathogenesis in HD mouse modelsP01NS092525 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THOMPSON, LESLIE MICHELS · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
Single-Molecule Imaging for Cell Biology and Super-Resolution MicroscopyR35GM118067 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOERNER, WILLIAM E · 2016 to 2025
$6.2M
Integration of regulatory networks and subcellular architecture to control the Caulobacter cell cycleR35GM118071 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAPIRO, LUCILLE · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118067NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118071NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS092525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Superresolution fluorescence microscopy and cryogenic electron tomography (CET) are powerful imaging methods for exploring the subcellular organization of biomolecules. Superresolution fluorescence microscopy based on covalent labeling highlights specific proteins and has sufficient sensitivity to observe single fluorescent molecules, but the reconstructions lack detailed cellular context. CET has molecular-scale resolution but lacks specific and nonperturbative intracellular labeling techniques. Here, we describe an imaging scheme that correlates cryogenic single-molecule fluorescence localizations with CET reconstructions. Our approach achieves single-molecule localizations with an average lateral precision of 9 nm, and a relative registration error between the set of localizations and CET reconstruction of ∼30 nm. We illustrate the workflow by annotating the positions of three proteins in the bacterium

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCaulobacter crescentusElectron Microscope TomographyMicroscopy, FluorescenceProtein TransportSingle Molecule ImagingBacterial ProteinsCIASMCLEMcorrelative microscopycryogenic electron tomographysuperresolution

Identifiers

PMID32513734
PMCPMC7321984
OpenAlexW3033664219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.