Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513694›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making.

Zhiyun Ouyang, Changsu Song, Hua Zheng, Stephen Polasky, Yi Xiao, Ian J Bateman, Jianguo Liu, Mary Ruckelshaus, Faqi Shi, Yang Xiao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping the "Supply-Demand-Flow" of Ecosystem Services for Ecosystem Management in China.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of the polycrisis: Anthropocene traps that challenge global sustainability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Investing in nature can improve equity and economic returns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhiyun OuyangState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-0499
Changsu SongState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China.
Hua ZhengState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China.
Stephen PolaskyDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; polasky@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4934-2434
Yi XiaoState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China.
Ian J BatemanLand, Environment, Economy and Policy Institute (LEEP), University of Exeter Business School, EX4 4PJ Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2791-6137
Jianguo LiuDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823.ORCID 0000-0001-6344-0087
Mary RuckelshausNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Faqi ShiDepartment of National Accounts, National Bureau of Statistics, 100824 Beijing, China.
Yang XiaoState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China.
Weihua XuState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China.
Ziying ZouCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China.
Gretchen C DailyNatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-1111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gross domestic product (GDP) summarizes a vast amount of economic information in a single monetary metric that is widely used by decision makers around the world. However, GDP fails to capture fully the contributions of nature to economic activity and human well-being. To address this critical omission, we develop a measure of gross ecosystem product (GEP) that summarizes the value of ecosystem services in a single monetary metric. We illustrate the measurement of GEP through an application to the Chinese province of Qinghai, showing that the approach is tractable using available data. Known as the "water tower of Asia," Qinghai is the source of the Mekong, Yangtze, and Yellow Rivers, and indeed, we find that water-related ecosystem services make up nearly two-thirds of the value of GEP for Qinghai. Importantly most of these benefits accrue downstream. In Qinghai, GEP was greater than GDP in 2000 and three-fourths as large as GDP in 2015 as its market economy grew. Large-scale investment in restoration resulted in improvements in the flows of ecosystem services measured in GEP (127.5%) over this period. Going forward, China is using GEP in decision making in multiple ways, as part of a transformation to inclusive, green growth. This includes investing in conservation of ecosystem assets to secure provision of ecosystem services through transregional compensation payments.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEcosystemModels, EconomicSustainable DevelopmentChinaConservation of Natural Resourcesecosystem servicesenvironmental–economic accountingGDPgross ecosystem productnatural capital

Identifiers

PMID32513694
PMCPMC7322027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.