Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513683›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Energy storage emerging: A perspective from the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research.

Lynn Trahey, Fikile R Brushett, Nitash P Balsara, Gerbrand Ceder, Lei Cheng, Yet-Ming Chiang, Nathan T Hahn, Brian J Ingram, Shelley D Minteer, Jeffrey S Moore and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wet Chemistry Route to LiAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sustainable lithium extraction enabled by responsive metal-organic frameworks with ion-sieving adsorption effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Capacity factors for electrical power generation from renewable and nonrenewable sources.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Lynn TraheyJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.
Fikile R BrushettJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439; brushett@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-6637
Nitash P BalsaraJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-5565
Gerbrand CederJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.
Lei ChengJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-1680
Yet-Ming ChiangJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0833-7674
Nathan T HahnJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.
Brian J IngramJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5219-7517
Shelley D MinteerJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2249
Jeffrey S MooreJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-6269
Karl T MuellerJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-9516
Linda F NazarJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-8197
Kristin A PerssonJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.
Donald J SiegelJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.
Kang XuJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6946-8635
Kevin R ZavadilJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-424X
Venkat SrinivasanJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.
George W CrabtreeJoint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-4468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy storage is an integral part of modern society. A contemporary example is the lithium (Li)-ion battery, which enabled the launch of the personal electronics revolution in 1991 and the first commercial electric vehicles in 2010. Most recently, Li-ion batteries have expanded into the electricity grid to firm variable renewable generation, increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of transmission and distribution. Important applications continue to emerge including decarbonization of heavy-duty vehicles, rail, maritime shipping, and aviation and the growth of renewable electricity and storage on the grid. This perspective compares energy storage needs and priorities in 2010 with those now and those emerging over the next few decades. The diversity of demands for energy storage requires a diversity of purpose-built batteries designed to meet disparate applications. Advances in the frontier of battery research to achieve transformative performance spanning energy and power density, capacity, charge/discharge times, cost, lifetime, and safety are highlighted, along with strategic research refinements made by the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR) and the broader community to accommodate the changing storage needs and priorities. Innovative experimental tools with higher spatial and temporal resolution, in situ and operando characterization, first-principles simulation, high throughput computation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence work collectively to reveal the origins of the electrochemical phenomena that enable new means of energy storage. This knowledge allows a constructionist approach to materials, chemistries, and architectures, where each atom or molecule plays a prescribed role in realizing batteries with unique performance profiles suitable for emergent demands.

Indexed as

batteriesenergy storagegridJoint Center for Energy Storage Researchtransportation

Identifiers

PMID32513683
PMCPMC7293617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.