Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513654›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Preservation of Genetic Variation in a Breeding Population for Long-Term Genetic Gain.

David Vanavermaete, Jan Fostier, Steven Maenhout, Bernard De Baets

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Progress in Genomic Mating in Domestic Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David VanavermaeteKERMIT, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium, David.Vanavermaete@ugent.be.
Jan FostierIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University - imec, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium, and.
Steven MaenhoutProgeno, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Bernard De BaetsKERMIT, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection has been successfully implemented in plant and animal breeding. The transition of parental selection based on phenotypic characteristics to genomic selection (GS) has reduced breeding time and cost while accelerating the rate of genetic progression. Although breeding methods have been adapted to include genomic selection, parental selection often involves

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenetic VariationPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait LociGenetic GainGenomic PredictionGenPredPlant BreedingQTL FixationShared data resourecesSimulation Study

Identifiers

PMID32513654
PMCPMC7407475
OpenAlexW3033772391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.