Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513311›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2020

Impact of hand hygiene intervention: a comparative study in health care facilities in Dodoma region, Tanzania using WHO methodology.

Karin Wiedenmayer, Vicky-Sidney Msamba, Fiona Chilunda, James Charles Kiologwe, Jeremiah Seni

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin WiedenmayerHealth Promotion and System Strengthening/Tuimarishe Afya Project, 7th Road, ACT Building, P.O. Box 29, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Vicky-Sidney MsambaHealth Promotion and System Strengthening/Tuimarishe Afya Project, 7th Road, ACT Building, P.O. Box 29, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Fiona ChilundaHealth Promotion and System Strengthening/Tuimarishe Afya Project, 7th Road, ACT Building, P.O. Box 29, Dodoma, Tanzania.
James Charles KiologweDodoma Regional Medical Officer's Office, P.O. Box 914, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Jeremiah SeniDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P. O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Bugando, Tanzania. senijj80@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2420-5329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompliance with guidelines on hand hygiene (HH) is pivotal to prevent and control health-care associated infections and contributes to mitigating antimicrobial resistance. A baseline assessment in Dodoma region, Tanzania in March 2018 showed inadequate HH levels across health care facilities. We evaluated the impact of training in HH as part of a water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions of "Maji kwa Afya ya Jamii" (MKAJI) project.

methodsA comparative HH assessment was conducted in June 2019 involving health care facilities under MKAJI project (n = 87 from which 98 units were assessed) vs non-MKAJI facilities (n = 85 from which 99 units were assessed). Irrespective of MKAJI interventional status, baseline assessment in March 2018 were compared to re-assessment in June 2019 in all health care facility units (unpaired comparison: 261 vs 236 units, respectively), and in facilities assessed in both surveys (paired comparison: 191 versus 191 units, respectively). The 'WHO HH Self-Assessment Framework Tool, 2010' with five indicators each counting 100 points was used. The cumulative scores stratified each health facility's unit into inadequate (0-125), basic (126-250), intermediate (251-375) or advanced (376-500) HH level (score). The HH compliance rates were also assessed and compared.

resultsThe overall post-intervention median HH score [interquartile range (IQR)] was 187.5 (112.5-260). MKAJI health facilities had significantly higher median HH scores (IQR) [190 (120-262.5)] compared with non-MKAJI facilities [165 (95-230); p = 0.038]. Similarly, the HH compliance rate of ≥51% was significantly higher in MKAJI than non-MKAJI facilities [56.1% versus 30.3%; chi2 = 13.39, p < 0.001]. However, the recommended WHO compliance rate of ≥81% was only reached by 6.1 and 3.0% units of MKAJI and non-MKAJI facilities, respectively. Both paired and unpaired comparisons during baseline and re-assessment surveys showed increase in HH level from inadequate to basic level.

conclusionThe overall HH level after the combined WASH and training intervention was at basic level. Higher median HH scores (IQR) and HH compliance rates were evident in health facilities of the MKAJI project, underscoring the impact of the intervention and the potential value of a national roll-out.

Indexed as

AdultCross InfectionFemaleGuideline AdherenceHand HygieneHealth PersonnelHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaWorld Health OrganizationYoung AdultHand hygieneHealth care facilitiesTanzania

Identifiers

PMID32513311
PMCPMC7282123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.