Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513237›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2020

Drug dosing in the critically ill obese patient-a focus on sedation, analgesia, and delirium.

Brian L Erstad, Jeffrey F Barletta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Post-intubation sedation in the emergency department: A scoping review.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Pediatric Difficult Airway Simulation Day.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian L ErstadDepartment of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Arizona, College of Pharmacy, 1295 N Martin Ave, PO Box 210202, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Jeffrey F BarlettaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University, College of Pharmacy, 19555 N 59th Ave, Glendale, AZ, 85308, USA. jbarle@midwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-8218
Midwestern University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practice guidelines provide clear evidence-based recommendations for the use of drug therapy to manage pain, agitation, and delirium associated with critical illness. Dosing recommendations however are often based on strategies used in patients with normal body habitus. Recommendations specific to critically ill patients with extreme obesity are lacking. Nonetheless, clinicians must craft dosing regimens for this population. This paper is intended to help clinicians design initial dosing regimens for medications commonly used in the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients with extreme obesity. A detailed literature search was conducted with an emphasis on obesity, pharmacokinetics, and dosing. Relevant manuscripts were reviewed and strategies for dosing are provided.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAnalgesiaAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesCritical IllnessDeep SedationDeliriumDexmedetomidineEtomidateHaloperidolHumansKetamineObesityPain ManagementQuetiapine FumarateAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesDexmedetomidineEtomidateHaloperidolKetamineQuetiapine FumarateCritical illnessDrug-dosingObesityPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32513237
PMCPMC7282067
OpenAlexW3033801927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.