Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513224›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2020

Serum and fecal profiles of aromatic microbial metabolites reflect gut microbiota disruption in critically ill patients: a prospective observational pilot study.

Ekaterina Chernevskaya, Natalia Beloborodova, Natalia Klimenko, Alisa Pautova, Dmitrii Shilkin, Vitaliy Gusarov, Alexander Tyakht

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mass spectrometry-based analysis of gut microbial metabolites of aromatic amino acids.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ekaterina ChernevskayaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 25-2 Petrovka str., Moscow, Russia, 107031. kate.chernevskaya@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9316-8907
Natalia BeloborodovaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 25-2 Petrovka str., Moscow, Russia, 107031.
Natalia KlimenkoAtlas Biomed Group - Knomics LLC, 31 Malaya Nikitskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 121069.
Alisa PautovaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 25-2 Petrovka str., Moscow, Russia, 107031.
Dmitrii ShilkinN. Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center, 70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 105203.
Vitaliy GusarovN. Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center, 70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 105203.
Alexander TyakhtAtlas Biomed Group - Knomics LLC, 31 Malaya Nikitskaya str., Moscow, Russia, 121069.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh serum levels of certain aromatic microbial metabolites (AMM) are associated with severity and mortality in critically ill patients. Omics-based studies suggest gut dysbiosis and reduced microbiome diversity in critical conditions. However, the landscape of gut microbial metabolites is still to be outlined, not to mention the interplay correlation between the metabolome and gut microbiome in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between serum and fecal levels of AMM and compare them with the composition of gut microbiota in critically ill patients in the acute and chronic stages.

methodsIn this prospective observational pilot study, we analyzed the temporal dynamics of the gut microbiome and the AMM spectrum across two distinct subgroups-acute critical ill (ACI) patients with nosocomial pneumonia and chronically critically ill (CCI) patients (9 subjects each group)-as well as performed comparison with 23 healthy volunteers. The AMM levels for each patient were measured using GC-MS in simultaneously taken serum and fecal samples (SFS). These parameters were compared with 16S rRNA fecal microbiome profiles.

resultsThe observed proportions of bacterial taxa suggest a significant gut dysbiosis in the ACI and the CCI patients. Stronger imbalance in microbiome composition and dynamics observed in the ACI patients compared to the CCI ones resonates with a higher severity in the former group. The total levels of AMM in serum samples were higher for the ACI patients than for the CCI patients (3.7 (1.4-6.3) and 1.1 (1.0-1.6) μM, respectively; p = 0.0003). The qualitative composition of the SFS was also altered. We discovered significant associations between gut microbial taxa levels and metabolite concentrations in blood serum as well as in feces in each of the ACI and the CCI patients.

conclusionsAromatic microbial metabolite profiles in the gut and the serum are interlinked and reflect a disruption of the gut microbial community in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDysbiosisFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSerumAromatic microbial metabolitesCritically ill patientsGC-MSHuman gut microbiomeICUMetabolome

Identifiers

PMID32513224
PMCPMC7278238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.