Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513172›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test kit to the gold standard fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of rabies in animals in Bhutan.

Tenzin Tenzin, Kelzang Lhamo, Purna B Rai, Dawa Tshering, Pema Jamtsho, Jamyang Namgyal, Thrinang Wangdi, Sangay Letho, Tuku Rai, Sonam Jamtsho and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of 4 laboratory tests for the detection of bovine rabies viral infection in Paraguay: fluorescent antibody test, rapid detection test, histologic lesions, and RT-PCR.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent updates on laboratory diagnosis of rabies.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. United Against Rabies Forum: The first 2 years.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tenzin TenzinDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan. tenzinvp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-3623
Kelzang LhamoDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Purna B RaiDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Dawa TsheringDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Pema JamtshoDistrict Veterinary Hospital, Trashigang, Bhutan.
Jamyang NamgyalDistrict Veterinary Hospital, Trashigang, Bhutan.
Thrinang WangdiRegional Livestock Development Centre, Kanglung, Trashigang, Bhutan.
Sangay LethoRegional Livestock Development Centre, Kanglung, Trashigang, Bhutan.
Tuku RaiCity Veterinary Hospital and Satellite Veterinary Laboratory, Phuentsholing, Bhutan.
Sonam JamtshoCity Veterinary Hospital and Satellite Veterinary Laboratory, Phuentsholing, Bhutan.
Chendu DorjiRegional Livestock Development Centre, Tshimasham, Chukha, Bhutan.
Sangay RinchenRegional Livestock Development Centre, Tshimasham, Chukha, Bhutan.
Lungten LungtenSatellite Veterinary Laboratory, Deothang, Samdrup Jongkhar, Bhutan.
Karma WangmoDistrict Veterinary Hospital, Samtse, Bhutan.
Lungten LungtenDistrict Veterinary Hospital, Samtse, Bhutan.
Pema WangchukRegional Livestock Development Centre, Zhemgang, Bhutan.
Tshewang GempoSatellite Veterinary Laboratory, Gelephu, Sarpang, Bhutan.
Kezang JigmeSatellite Veterinary Laboratory, Gelephu, Sarpang, Bhutan.
Karma PhuntshokDistrict Veterinary Hospital, Samdrup Jongkhar, Bhutan.
Tenzinla TenzinlaDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Ratna B GurungDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Kinzang DukpaDepartment of Livestock, National Centre for Animal Health, Serbithang, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Centre for Bhutan Studies and GNH Research · BTMinistry of Agriculture and Forests · BT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabies kills approximately 59,000 people each year worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of rabies is important for instituting rapid containment measures and for advising the exposed people for postexposure treatment. The application of a rapid diagnostic tests in the field can greatly enhance disease surveillance and diagnostic activities, especially in resource poor settings. In this study, a total of 179 brain tissue samples collected from different rabies suspect animal species (113 dogs, 50 cattle, 10 cats, 3 goats, 2 horses, and 1 bear) were selected and tested using both rapid immunochromatographic kit and the reference standard fluorescent antibody test (FAT). We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of a rapid antigen detection test kit produced by BioNote, Inc. (Hwaseong-si, Korea) relative to a FAT for its fit-for-purpose for confirmation of clinical cases of rabies for early response and enhancing rabies surveillance.

resultsAmong 179 samples examined in this study, there was a concordance in results by the rapid test and FAT in 115 positive samples and 54 negative samples. Test results were discordant in 10 samples which were positive by FAT, but negative (false negative) by rapid kit. The rapid test kit showed a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85.9-95.6) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93.4-100) using FAT as the reference standard. The positive and negative predictive values were found to be 100% (95% CI:96.7-100) and 84.4% (95% CI: 73.6-91.3), respectively. Overall, there was 94.4% (95% CI: 90-96.9) test agreement between rapid test and FAT (Kappa value = 0.874) with a positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of 92 and 100%, respectively.

conclusionsOur finding demonstrated that the rapid test kit (BioNote) can be used for rabies surveillance and confirming clinical case of rabies in animals for making rapid decisions particularly controlling rabies outbreaks in resource poor settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ViralBhutanBrainChromatography, AffinityDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFluorescent Antibody TechniqueImmunologic TestsMammalsRabiesRabies virusSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, ViralBhutanDiagnostic testFluorescent antibody testRabies virusRapid anigen testRapid immunochromatographic test

Identifiers

PMID32513172
PMCPMC7281917
OpenAlexW3033057099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.