Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32513161›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2020

Acceptability of the "MOVEdiabetes" physical activity intervention in diabetes primary care settings in Oman: findings from participants and practitioners.

Thamra S Alghafri, Saud M Al Harthi, Fatma Al-Ajmi, Yahya Al-Farsi, Angela M Craigie, Elaine Bannerman, Annie S Anderson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thamra S AlghafriDirectorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman & University of Dundee, PO Box 2723, Postal Code 112, Muscat, Oman. thamra74@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-9565
Saud M Al HarthiDirectorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
Fatma Al-AjmiDirectorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
Yahya Al-FarsiDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Angela M CraigieCentre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Elaine BannermanGlobal Academy of Agriculture & Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Annie S AndersonCentre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

Ministry of Health Not applicableThe Research Council Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate physical activity (PA) is considered essential in diabetes management. However, evidence on the best method of promoting PA within diabetes care is inconclusive. The current work identifies perceptions on the acceptability of Intervention Group Participants (IGP) and Project Officers (POs) about the "MOVEdiabetes" intervention programme aimed at increasing PA in adults with type 2 diabetes in Oman (a retrospectively registered trial).

methodsThe "MOVEdiabetes" programme (PA consultations, pedometers and WhatsApp messages) was delivered by the POs (primary health care practitioners) in four primary care centres within a one-year cluster randomised control trial. Recruitment and retention were measured from trial attendance records. Programme satisfaction, appropriateness, and content suitability were assessed using exit surveys for both the IGP (interview based) and POs (self-administered). Open text questions on perceptions to the study programme were also included.

resultsParticipants were randomised to an intervention group (IG, n = 122) or comparison group (CG, n = 110). The overall retention rate at three and 12 months was 92.7% [110(90.2%) IG vs 105(95.5%) CG] and 75% [82(67.2%) IG vs 92(83.6%) CG] respectively. Most (n = 14, 87.5%) POs and more than half (n = 49, 59.8%) IGP perceived the programme as very appropriate and many reported that they were "quite/ very satisfied" with the programme (n = 16, 100% PO's and n = 71, 86.6% IGP). Two thirds (n = 55, 66.0%) of IGP were very/quite likely to recommend the programme to others. PA consultations, use of pedometers and Whatsapp messages were well perceived by all. Participants recommended the inclusion of dietary advice and PA promotion for the general public. Exploring PA facilities within the community was suggested by POs.

conclusionsThe "MOVEdiabetes" programme achieved a high retention rate and was perceived as satisfactory and appropriate. Results from this study suggest that it is worthwhile exploring the use of the "MOVEdiabetes" programme in clinical practice and further community links.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trials No: ISRCTN14425284. Registered retrospectively on 12th April 2016.

Indexed as

ActigraphyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBehavior TherapyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmanPatient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareResearch DesignInterventionMOVEdiabetesOmanPhysical activityPrimary health careRecruitment and retentionType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32513161
PMCPMC7281938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.