Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32512857›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Porcine Faecal Commensal

Tiziana Zingali, Cameron J Reid, Toni A Chapman, Daniela Gaio, Michael Liu, Aaron E Darling, Steven P Djordjevic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic analysis of multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Antimicrobial Resistance in CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Phylogenetic Analysis ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiziana ZingaliThe ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia.
Cameron J ReidThe ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia.
Toni A ChapmanNSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle NSW 2568, Australia.
Daniela GaioThe ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia.
Michael LiuThe ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia.
Aaron E DarlingThe ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia.
Steven P DjordjevicThe ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council LP150100912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive pig production systems often rely on the use of antimicrobials and heavy metal feed additives to maintain animal health and welfare. To gain insight into the carriage of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in the faecal flora of commercially reared healthy swine, we characterised the genome sequences of 117 porcine commensal

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceclass 1 integroncommensal E. colimicrobial genomic epidemiologyporcine E. coli

Identifiers

PMID32512857
PMCPMC7355456
OpenAlexW3033260768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.