Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32512767›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Guidelines for Physical Activity-A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess Their Application in the General Population. Have We Achieved Our Goal?

Stefano Palermi, Anna Maria Sacco, Immacolata Belviso, Veronica Romano, Pietro Montesano, Bruno Corrado, Felice Sirico

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Consequences of Insufficient Physical Activity: A Comparative Analysis of Poland and Europe.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Snacktivity™ to Promote Physical Activity: a Qualitative Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effects of Shopping Rehabilitation on Older People's Daily Activities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano PalermiDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Anna Maria SaccoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Immacolata BelvisoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Veronica RomanoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pietro MontesanoDepartment of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples Parthenope, 80133 Naples, Italy.
Bruno CorradoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Felice SiricoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-3308
University of Naples Federico II · ITParthenope University of Naples · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National and international healthcare organizations propose guidelines for physical activity worldwide, defining its characteristics. These guidelines' practical applications are difficult to estimate, since they are not fully followed. The aim of the present cross-sectional observational study was to assess awareness about guidelines for physical activity and to evaluate their practical applications in a sample of the Italian population. In total, 310 participants completed an online survey (mean age 29.10 ± 4.44), assessing the habits, beliefs and health effects of physical activity. In total, 39.35% of respondents were inactive. In total, 6.91% of active respondents did not perform a warm-up phase at the beginning of each training session and 77.14% did not check their own heart rate during the training session. Approximately half of respondents reported erroneous beliefs about the type, frequency and volume of physical activity, compared to data proposed by the guidelines. The preventive effect of physical activity was clearly perceived for cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and depression. Several subjects misinterpreted the preventive role of physical activity in colon and breast cancers, and in femur and vertebral fractures. Habits and beliefs about physical activity in the general population are far from the guidelines and recommendations. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the conscious practice of physical activity further.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesExerciseGoalsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAttitude to ComputersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultguidelineshealthphysical activitypreventionsport

Identifiers

PMID32512767
PMCPMC7313455
OpenAlexW3033101281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.