Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32512726›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2020

Considering the Experimental use of Temozolomide in Glioblastoma Research.

Verena J Herbener, Timo Burster, Alicia Goreth, Maximilian Pruss, Hélène von Bandemer, Tim Baisch, Rahel Fitzel, Markus D Siegelin, Georg Karpel-Massler, Klaus-Michael Debatin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Adenosine and 1,NInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Natural Compounds as Promising Adjuvant Agents in The Treatment of Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Verena J HerbenerDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Timo BursterDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences and Humanities, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-6558
Alicia GorethDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Maximilian PrussDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Hélène von BandemerDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Tim BaischDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Rahel FitzelDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Markus D SiegelinDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Georg Karpel-MasslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Klaus-Michael DebatinDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Mike-Andrew WesthoffDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3256-7100
Hannah StrobelDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, D-89075 Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNazarbayev University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temozolomide (TMZ) currently remains the only chemotherapeutic component in the approved treatment scheme for Glioblastoma (GB), the most common primary brain tumour with a dismal patient's survival prognosis of only ~15 months. While frequently described as an alkylating agent that causes DNA damage and thus-ultimately-cell death, a recent debate has been initiated to re-evaluate the therapeutic role of TMZ in GB. Here, we discuss the experimental use of TMZ and highlight how it differs from its clinical role. Four areas could be identified in which the experimental data is particularly limited in its translational potential: 1. transferring clinical dosing and scheduling to an experimental system and vice versa; 2. the different use of (non-inert) solvent in clinic and laboratory; 3. the limitations of established GB cell lines which only poorly mimic GB tumours; and 4. the limitations of animal models lacking an immune response. Discussing these limitations in a broader biomedical context, we offer suggestions as to how to improve transferability of data. Finally, we highlight an underexplored function of TMZ in modulating the immune system, as an example of where the aforementioned limitations impede the progression of our knowledge.

Indexed as

established cell linesGlioblastomalimitations of experimental systemsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID32512726
PMCPMC7344626
OpenAlexW3033849254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.